2008
DOI: 10.1680/gein.2008.15.5.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced alternative sub-ballast material in a railway track

Abstract: Geosynthetics have been used as reinforcement in various applications in geotechnical engineering. This paper presents a study on the use of geosynthetic reinforcement to reduce the consumption of good-quality sub-ballast material in a railway track in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Six test sections on the railway were instrumented and monitored for a period of 2 years. Nonwoven geotextile and a geogrid were used as reinforcement in different positions in the subballast. The results obtained showed that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary laboratory tests conducted using large-scale drop-weight impact equipment have revealed that rubber shockmats could decrease impact-induced strains in the ballast layer by as much as 50% (Nimbalkar et al 2012). Only a very limited number of full-scale studies have been carried out to investigate the effects of geosynthetic reinforcement and shockmats on in situ track performance (Fernandes et al 2008;Indraratna et al 2010Indraratna et al , 2014a. However, effects of tamping and varied subgrade conditions on long-term track performance, including subsequent improvements through the use of artificial inclusions, have not been investigated in a systematic manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary laboratory tests conducted using large-scale drop-weight impact equipment have revealed that rubber shockmats could decrease impact-induced strains in the ballast layer by as much as 50% (Nimbalkar et al 2012). Only a very limited number of full-scale studies have been carried out to investigate the effects of geosynthetic reinforcement and shockmats on in situ track performance (Fernandes et al 2008;Indraratna et al 2010Indraratna et al , 2014a. However, effects of tamping and varied subgrade conditions on long-term track performance, including subsequent improvements through the use of artificial inclusions, have not been investigated in a systematic manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geogrids have been widely used in the substructure of rail tracks to reinforce the ballast and to increase the duration of track serviceability (Raymond 2002;McDowell and Stickley 2006;Brown et al 2007;Fernandes et al 2008;Kwon and Penman 2009;Indraratna et al 2011a). It has been reported that due to the mechanical interlock with aggregates, geogrids can decrease lateral spreading and the degradation of ballast (Bathurst and Raymond 1987;Brown et al 2006;Indraratna et al 2013;Biabani et al 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geogrid has been widely recognized as a useful method for stabilizing ballast, because it provides additional internal confining pressure and reinforcement, which (1) decreases maintenance costs and (2) enhances track serviceability (Bathurst and Raymond 1987;Göbel et al 1994;Raymond 2002;Shin et al 2002;Raymond and Ismail 2003;Brown et al 2006Brown et al , 2007Fernandes et al 2008;Qian et al 2010;Indraratna et al 2006Indraratna et al , 2011a. When the geogrid is installed between the layers of ballast and subballast, it interacts with the surrounding grains to carry tensile loads imposed by the repeated train loadings by effectively interlocking between itself and the ballast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%