2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of fuzzy logic and artificial neural network in prediction of ground and air vibrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these techniques, some other input parameters related to blasting design, rock mass properties, and explosive material were utilized for ground vibration prediction (e.g., Singh and Singh 2005;Khandelwal and Singh 2009;Hajihassani et al 2015b;Dindarloo 2015a). However, the implementation of statistical techniques is not reliable if new available data are different from the original ones (Khandelwal and Singh 2009;Mohamed 2011;Verma and Maheshwar 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these techniques, some other input parameters related to blasting design, rock mass properties, and explosive material were utilized for ground vibration prediction (e.g., Singh and Singh 2005;Khandelwal and Singh 2009;Hajihassani et al 2015b;Dindarloo 2015a). However, the implementation of statistical techniques is not reliable if new available data are different from the original ones (Khandelwal and Singh 2009;Mohamed 2011;Verma and Maheshwar 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They highlighted the high-performance prediction of the fuzzy model in estimating PPV. Mohamed (2011) proposed both ANN and FIS models for estimating PPV and reported that FIS approach can provide slightly higher performance capacity in approximating PPV. Based on obtained blasting parameters from Bakhtiari Dam, Iran, Hasanipanah et al (2015) utilized and introduced a support vector machine (SVM) model to estimate PPV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compared the performance of ANN with that of the multivariate regression analysis (MVRA) and the United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) predictor and proved the superiority of their proposed model over MVRA and USBM in terms of estimation accuracy. Considering the distance from the blast-face to the monitoring point and the maximum charge per delay, Mohamed [38] applied ANN and a fuzzy inference system (FIS) to the prediction of AOp. He made a comparison between the results obtained from the predictive models and the values of regression analyses and observed field data.…”
Section: Aop Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these techniques, several other input parameters related to blast design, rock mass and explosive properties were utilized for ground vibration prediction (e.g., [6,10,22,23]). However, the application of statistical techniques is limited to a specific site and/or data and are not generic (or universal) in nature [22,24,25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohamed [24] proposed both ANN and FIS models for estimating PPV and reported that FIS approach can provide slightly higher performance capacity in approximating the PPV. Based on the blast parameters obtained from Bakhtiari Dam, Iran, Hasanipanah et al [31] introduced a support vector machine (SVM) model to estimate PPV.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%