2017
DOI: 10.9790/1684-140306100105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Footing on MICP Induced Slope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This group of experiments were examined for the different hillside slopes of 5 • , 10 • , 20 • , one-hour constant rainfall, rainfall intensity of 41 (mm/h) and 66 (mm/h) to discuss the soil erosion differences between the control group (non-solidification) and the test group (solidification), which Tables 6 and 7 show. The results with a bearing capacity of footing on slope of 1.5H:1V (33.69 • ) have significantly increased after MICP treatment based on Pusadkar et al (2017) [38]. Moreover, the results thatwere proposed by Shao et al (2017) for applying MICP technology on silt slope anti-erosion provide valuable enlightenments [34].…”
Section: Slope and Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group of experiments were examined for the different hillside slopes of 5 • , 10 • , 20 • , one-hour constant rainfall, rainfall intensity of 41 (mm/h) and 66 (mm/h) to discuss the soil erosion differences between the control group (non-solidification) and the test group (solidification), which Tables 6 and 7 show. The results with a bearing capacity of footing on slope of 1.5H:1V (33.69 • ) have significantly increased after MICP treatment based on Pusadkar et al (2017) [38]. Moreover, the results thatwere proposed by Shao et al (2017) for applying MICP technology on silt slope anti-erosion provide valuable enlightenments [34].…”
Section: Slope and Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the discharge rate (the ratio of the OD600 value of the discharged bacterial liquid to the OD600 value of the inoculated bacterial liquid) of bacterial liquid from the sand column, CaCl 2 was chosen as the fixative solution. According to related references [9,13], the higher the concentration of the fixative solution was, the lower the discharge rate of the bacterial liquid was. But under a certain concentration of CaCl 2 , the inoculated bacterial liquid will form the floccules, and its diameter sizes enlarged with the increasing concentration of CaCl 2 and blocked the pores between the uranium tailings, resulting in nonuniform distribution of bacterial liquid and unstable transmission of cement solution in the sand column.…”
Section: Fixative Solution and Cement Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e uniaxial compressive strength of reinforced piles was up to 8.9 MPa-2.3 GPa [12]. Pusadkar et al reinforced the sand slop in the laboratory by injecting bacteria (S. Pasteurii) and cement solution in sand, and the bearing capacity of slope footing increased significantly after MICP treatment [13]. Grabiec et al applied the MICP technology to reinforce the incompletely compacted silty clays, and found that MICP technology can make diagenesis in the silty clays and significantly improve the soil stiffness [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%