2011 8th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2011.6125372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of error correction based on Compressed Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BASC sensing matrix [19] construction yields minimal coherence between code words, but they had to be adapted the feasible hardware implementation. They were the best performing matrices with observed improvement as shown in Table I and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BASC sensing matrix [19] construction yields minimal coherence between code words, but they had to be adapted the feasible hardware implementation. They were the best performing matrices with observed improvement as shown in Table I and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ENCRUST scheme is designed using CS concepts, we use means square error (MSE) as the performance metric for K-sparse signals. If the MSE is less than 10 −6 , then the reconstruction is regarded as successful [24], [52]. To measure the error recovery capability, we use different channel parameters as discussed in the following subsection.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%