2014
DOI: 10.4314/ejesm.v7i1.6s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regime in Tanzania

Abstract: Tanzania enacted the Environmental Management Act (EMA) in 2004 with

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in the case of projects that are highly needed by the government as the case of the two case studies, it is difficult for the Minister to act contrary to the wish of the government. It is therefore not uncommon for government projects to be implemented without conducting EIA and/or SEA as required by national laws (Environmental Investigation Agency, 2021; Nyihirani et al, 2014; Sosovele, 2011). To wit, the implementation of Nyerere Hydropower project started before conducting SEA as required by EMA (Environmental Investigation Agency, 2021; URT, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, in the case of projects that are highly needed by the government as the case of the two case studies, it is difficult for the Minister to act contrary to the wish of the government. It is therefore not uncommon for government projects to be implemented without conducting EIA and/or SEA as required by national laws (Environmental Investigation Agency, 2021; Nyihirani et al, 2014; Sosovele, 2011). To wit, the implementation of Nyerere Hydropower project started before conducting SEA as required by EMA (Environmental Investigation Agency, 2021; URT, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are a number of studies that have been conducted to address the effectiveness of the Tanzania legal framework for EIA in general (Mwalyosi & Hughes, 1998; Nyihirani et al, 2014; Sosovele, 2011), little is known about the effectiveness of the said framework in relation to projects that are implemented within or around World Heritage sites. Therefore, this study is expected to contribute to address the existing knowledge gap on the effectiveness of Tanzania EIA legal regime in protecting World Heritage sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internationally, the focus of EIA evaluation research has been to assess EIA system performance based on EIA system components (EIA regulatory, administrative, and procedural frameworks), EIA implementation, and EIA report without rigorously considering the country context (Ahmad & Wood, 2002; Alberts, 2020; Alberts et al, 2022; Barker & Wood, 1999; Chanchitpricha & Bond, 2013; Glasson et al, 2005; Khosravi et al, 2019a; Lee et al, 1999; Nadeem & Hameed, 2008; Nakwaya‐Jacobus et al, 2021; Nyihirani et al, 2014; Sadler, 1996; Wood, 1995d, 1999b, 2003). Primarily, these types of EIA performance assessments are based on evaluative approaches and frameworks, consisting of evaluation criteria that aim to check compliance and identify the gaps and constraints in the EIA system components and implementation, which seek to advance EIA system performance (Annandale, 2001; Kolhoff et al, 2009; Loomis & Dziedzic, 2018; Wood, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%