Performance of different imaging modalities in assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in primary esophageal cancer

Yip, Connie; Cook, Gary; Landau, David; Davies, Andrew

doi:10.1111/dote.12315

Cited by 17 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 67 publications

(192 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidence for re-staging with each modality differs but generally the accuracy of repeat investigation and response evaluation is suboptimal. [49] The main questions that re-staging aims to answer are whether the disease is still curable (i.e. to exclude disease progression), how much disease remains (i.e.…”

Section: M-stagementioning

confidence: 99%

Novel imaging techniques in staging oesophageal cancer

Foley

Findlay

2018

Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: M-stagementioning

confidence: 99%

Novel imaging techniques in staging oesophageal cancer

Foley

Findlay

2018

Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To implement non‐surgical treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer it is critical to accurately identify pCR. CT and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT are both inaccurate in discriminating residual disease from pCR owing to the presence of wall thickening and/or radiation oesophagitis. The same is true for endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), which has an accuracy of only 36 per cent for ypT determination.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnostic performance of MRI for assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

Vollenbrock

Voncken

Dieren

et al. 2019

British Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer may benefit from non‐surgical management. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of visual response assessment of the primary tumour after nCRT on T2‐weighted (T2W) and diffusion‐weighted (DW) MRI. Methods Patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer who underwent T2W‐ and DW‐MRI (1·5 T) before and after nCRT in two hospitals, between July 2013 and September 2017, were included in this prospective study. Three radiologists evaluated T2W images retrospectively using a five‐point score for the assessment of residual tumour in a blinded manner and immediately rescored after adding DW‐MRI. Histopathology of the resection specimen was used as the reference standard; ypT0 represented a pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and interobserver agreement were calculated. Results Twelve of 51 patients (24 per cent) had a pCR. The sensitivity and specificity of T2W‐MRI for detection of residual tumour ranged from 90 to 100 and 8 to 25 per cent respectively. Respective values for T2W + DW‐MRI were 90–97 and 42–50 per cent. AUCs for the three readers were 0·65, 0·66 and 0·68 on T2W‐MRI, and 0·71, 0·70 and 0·70 on T2W + DW‐MRI ( P = 0·441, P = 0·611 and P = 0·828 for readers 1, 2 and 3 respectively). The κ value for interobserver agreement improved from 0·24–0·55 on T2W‐MRI to 0·55–0·71 with DW‐MRI. Conclusion Preoperative assessment of residual tumour on MRI after nCRT for oesophageal cancer is feasible with high sensitivity, reflecting a low chance of missing residual tumour. However, the specificity was low; this results in overstaging of complete responders as having residual tumour and, consequently, overtreatment.

show abstract

“…Several diagnostic strategies have been proposed to predict response and ultimately omit surgery in selected patients. Computed tomography (CT) is used preferably in initial staging of esophageal cancer, especially with regard to the presence of distant metastases, but does not satisfactorily restage after nCRT (accuracies ranging from 51 to 75%) [ 10 – 12 ]. Remaining tumor tissue is difficult to distinguish from therapy-induced peritumoral fibrosis and inflammation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observational study

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundNearly one third of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer have a pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor upon histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. The primary aim of this study is to develop a model that predicts the probability of pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer, based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT). Accurate response prediction could lead to a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future in case of predicted pCR or additional neoadjuvant treatment in case of non-pCR.MethodsThe PRIDE study is a prospective, single arm, observational multicenter study designed to develop a multimodal prediction model for histopathological response to nCRT for esophageal cancer. A total of 200 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer - of which at least 130 patients with adenocarcinoma and at least 61 patients with squamous cell carcinoma - scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy will be included. The primary modalities to be incorporated in the prediction model are quantitative parameters derived from MRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT scans, which will be acquired at fixed intervals before, during and after nCRT. Secondary modalities include blood samples for analysis of the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at 3 time-points (before, during and after nCRT), and an endoscopy with (random) bite-on-bite biopsies of the primary tumor site and other suspected lesions in the esophagus as well as an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration of suspected lymph nodes after finishing nCRT. The main study endpoint is the performance of the model for pCR prediction. Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival.DiscussionIf the multimodal PRIDE concept provides high predictive performance for pCR, the results of this study will play an important role in accurate identification of esophageal cancer patients with a pCR to nCRT. These patients might benefit from a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future. Vice versa, patients with non-pCR might benefit from additional neoadjuvant treatment, or ineffective therapy could be stopped.Trial registrationThe article reports on a health care intervention on human participants and was prospectively registered on March 22, 2018 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03474341.

show abstract

Performance of different imaging modalities in assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in primary esophageal cancer

Cited by 17 publications

References 67 publications

Novel imaging techniques in staging oesophageal cancer

Novel imaging techniques in staging oesophageal cancer

Diagnostic performance of MRI for assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observational study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About