2020
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1737146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of data-based models for early detection of damage in concrete dams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be able to analyse this effect, detailed models are required that can capture the crack initiation and propagation in concrete such as non-linear finite element analyses based on constitutive material models. Other types of methods such as data-based (statistical) models or simplified models may capture the behaviour of an undamaged or an already damaged case, but can typically not capture the transition from undamaged to damaged or answer questions regarding the current state of a cracked dam [9]. However, the different methods have their benefits and the use of one type of model does not exclude the possibility of also using others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be able to analyse this effect, detailed models are required that can capture the crack initiation and propagation in concrete such as non-linear finite element analyses based on constitutive material models. Other types of methods such as data-based (statistical) models or simplified models may capture the behaviour of an undamaged or an already damaged case, but can typically not capture the transition from undamaged to damaged or answer questions regarding the current state of a cracked dam [9]. However, the different methods have their benefits and the use of one type of model does not exclude the possibility of also using others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods, however, need a sufficient amount of data, typically a few years of recordings, in order to train and evaluate the models. In addition, this type of model can have difficulties in detecting progressive damage evolution, as shown by [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been widely used. 1,19,26,[27][28][29][30][31] In addition, the typical small probability method is to make the probability distribution statistics of the monitoring data under different load combinations to determine the control limits of the target variable using the probability density function and the probability of dam failure. 32 Based on the idea of typical small probability, Prakash et al 33 calculated the distribution of the squared prediction error (SPE) and determined two control limits based on its cumulative distribution curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomaly detection is usually based on the hypothesis that the behavior of an undamaged dam follows an expected pattern, a deviation from which indicates damage. 1 Therefore, anomaly detection is comprised of two steps: establishment of a high-precision dam behavior model and determination of control limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the model parameters don't have physical meaning and these models are not able to provide an essential explanation to the dam behaviours (e.g. long-term deformation) [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%