2008
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731108001961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of dairy ewes fed diets with a fibrolytic enzyme product included in the concentrate during the suckling period

Abstract: Seventy-two multiparous ewes from two dairy breeds (Manchega, n 5 36 and Lacaune, n 5 36) were used in a replicated 2 3 2 factorial design to evaluate the effects of diet supplementation with an exogenous fibrolytic enzyme product on lactation performance and feed intake during the suckling period (weeks 1 to 4) according to breed. Ewes were blocked in groups of nine and fed ad libitum after lambing a diet based on 70% forage and 30% concentrate to which the enzyme was added after pelleting. Experimental conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ration DMI averaged 2.02±0.04 kg/d (4.8% of BW) from wk 10 to 26 of lactation, according to the value of DMI predicted by INRAtion v.2.7 (2.1 kg DM/d), and was similar in both groups of goats. This result agrees with other studies in which no differences in DMI were reported in suckling goats and ewes (Titi and Lubbadeh, 2004;Flores et al, 2008), dairy sheep (Flores et al, 2002(Flores et al, , 2008, beef steers (Feng et al, 1996), heifers (Hristov et al, 2000) or in dairy cows Yang et al, 1999;Kung et al, 2000;Bowman et al, 2002) when similar enzyme mixture with cellulase and xylanase activity were added to either TMR, forage or concentrate.…”
Section: Results and Discusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ration DMI averaged 2.02±0.04 kg/d (4.8% of BW) from wk 10 to 26 of lactation, according to the value of DMI predicted by INRAtion v.2.7 (2.1 kg DM/d), and was similar in both groups of goats. This result agrees with other studies in which no differences in DMI were reported in suckling goats and ewes (Titi and Lubbadeh, 2004;Flores et al, 2008), dairy sheep (Flores et al, 2002(Flores et al, , 2008, beef steers (Feng et al, 1996), heifers (Hristov et al, 2000) or in dairy cows Yang et al, 1999;Kung et al, 2000;Bowman et al, 2002) when similar enzyme mixture with cellulase and xylanase activity were added to either TMR, forage or concentrate.…”
Section: Results and Discusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although many experiments on enzymes have been conducted in dairy cows (Beauchemin et al, 2003), only a few results have been reported in sheep (Flores et al, 2002(Flores et al, , 2008Pinos-Rodríguez et al, 2002;Titi and Lubbadeh, 2004) or in goats (Titi and Lubbadeh, 2004). The last authors refer to the short time effects of enzymes in suckling goats and, to our knowledge, no enzyme effects have been reported in dairy goats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, Dean et al (2007) revealed that enzyme supplementation did not improve in vivo digestibility of lactating cows, therefore milk production was not significantly affected. Flores et al (2008) found that no effects on lactation when fibrolytic enzyme product was added to the concentrate of dairy ewes. Milk protein was higher in treated groups but differences were not significant.…”
Section: Milk Yield and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another study conducted by Flores et al (2008) reported no effects on lactation when the fibrolytic enzyme product was added to the concentrate of dairy ewes.…”
Section: Sheepmentioning
confidence: 97%