2016
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of CT in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: The diagnostic performances of CT and ultrasound are similar, though CT and ultrasound combined are superior to ultrasound only. CT may be used as a complementary diagnostic method in addition to ultrasound for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous meta-analysis reported that US showed an overall AUC of 0.85 in diagnosing lateral cervical LNM with a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI: 68-75) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI: 93-99) [9]. Similar results were obtained in a more recent study, in which US demonstrated a summary sensitivity of 71% (95% CI: 57-82) and a specificity of 85% (95% CI: 64-94) [31]. Despite its high accuracy, the performance of US is affected by the experience of the physician-among aspects of staging US, only the performance of diagnosing lateral LNM significantly differed between experienced and less experienced physicians [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A previous meta-analysis reported that US showed an overall AUC of 0.85 in diagnosing lateral cervical LNM with a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI: 68-75) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI: 93-99) [9]. Similar results were obtained in a more recent study, in which US demonstrated a summary sensitivity of 71% (95% CI: 57-82) and a specificity of 85% (95% CI: 64-94) [31]. Despite its high accuracy, the performance of US is affected by the experience of the physician-among aspects of staging US, only the performance of diagnosing lateral LNM significantly differed between experienced and less experienced physicians [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, subjective evaluation of these signs by radiologists has limited the performance for the diagnosis of LN metastasis. Previous studies reported that the sensitivity was approximately 55%-62%, and the speci city was 87% [17,18], which are signi cantly lower than the results of our study. In recent years, radiomics have been applied in the evaluation of PTC cervical LN metastasis mainly based on US image analysis [5,31,32].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Current guidelines recommend CT examination when US assessment is inadequate, large, or extensive for LN metastasis [15,16]. However, the sensitivity of traditional CT diagnosis method for predicting PTC cervical LN metastasis is also insu cient, approximately 55%-62% [17,18] In addition, the interpretation of image signs is highly subjective and diagnoses may not be accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined ultrasound and CT may have a higher sensitivity for macroscopic nodal metastasis detection preoperatively, compared to ultrasound alone [33,34]. Contrast enhanced CT helps in the accurate delineation of the primary tumour and the metastatic disease with the surrounding areas.…”
Section: Ct and Mri Neckmentioning
confidence: 99%