2010 IEEE Radar Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2010.5494409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of cross-polarization filter dedicated for slotted waveguide antenna array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal taper profile of the dielectric in Figure 6 with the staircase model has geometrical parameters fixed as follows: ∆ w = 4 mm, H 2 = 39.48 mm, H 3 = 36. 33 The instantaneous phase of the radiation field from the dielectric surface with no taper profile received at points A, B, and C, assumed to be within the far-field region from the antenna, i.e., = 2 / (maximum linear dimension of an antenna is D), is shown in Figure 7a. It can be noted that there is a significant phase difference between the received fields at these points, resulting in a scattering wave to cause reflection and destructive interference.…”
Section: End Gradient Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal taper profile of the dielectric in Figure 6 with the staircase model has geometrical parameters fixed as follows: ∆ w = 4 mm, H 2 = 39.48 mm, H 3 = 36. 33 The instantaneous phase of the radiation field from the dielectric surface with no taper profile received at points A, B, and C, assumed to be within the far-field region from the antenna, i.e., = 2 / (maximum linear dimension of an antenna is D), is shown in Figure 7a. It can be noted that there is a significant phase difference between the received fields at these points, resulting in a scattering wave to cause reflection and destructive interference.…”
Section: End Gradient Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the effectiveness of the filter is inversely proportional to wall spacing and proportional to the distance ρ between the filter and the waveguide wall. However, the attenuation of the denoted by is determined primarily from the wall spacing as expressed in (6) [ 33 ]. Referring to Figure 2 , the filter’s orthogonal walls are positioned in such a way that they stand in between the adjacent slots to limit the efficient propagation of undesired E V to guarantee the sidelobes’ suppression, as observed in Figure 3 a.…”
Section: Antenna Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above results and analysis, since there is mature theory for cross-polarization suppression [1][2][3][4][5][6]9] , the key point of designing parallel metallic plates is not to affect the original amplitude distribution for co-polarization. Plate lengths around half the wavelength obviously become forbidden choices.…”
Section: Matching Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to meet this requirement, LSRWSAAs, with consideration for design and fabrication simplicity, generally need to achieve great cross-polarization suppression at first [2] . Several simple methods have been studied to suppress cross-polarization [1,[3][4][5][6] , such as choke slots, metallic grids, adjusting the distance between antennas and ground plane, parallel metallic plates etc. Choke slots are not preferred for large-scale arrays because of their big volume, heavy weight and narrow bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of decreasing undesired cross-polarization in narrow-wall slotted waveguide array antenna, some methods have been presented. Using polarization filter is the simplest way to reduce cross-polarization [1]. A kind of polarization filter is consisted of orthogonal walls between slots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%