Performance of COVID-19 associated symptoms and temperature checking as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection

Abstract

Introduction Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), which started in late December, 2019, has spread to affect 216 countries and territories around the world. Globally, the number of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been growing exponentially. There is pressure on countries to flatten the curves and break transmission. Most countries are practicing partial or total lockdown, vaccination, massive education on hygiene, social distancing, isolation of cases, quarantine of exposed and various screening approaches such as temperature and symptom-based screening to break the transmission. Some studies outside Africa have found the screening for fever using non-contact thermometers to lack good sensitivity for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of clinical symptoms in accurately predicting a final diagnosis of COVID-19 disease in the Ghanaian setting. Method The study analysed screening and test data of COVID-19 suspected, probable and contacts for the months of March to August 2020. A total of 1,986 participants presenting to Tamale Teaching hospital were included in the study. Logistic regression and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis were carried out. Results Overall SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate was 16.8%. Those with symptoms had significantly higher positivity rate (21.6%) compared with asymptomatic (17.0%) [chi-squared 15.5, p-value, <0.001]. Patients that were positive for SARS-CoV-2 were 5.9 [3.9–8.8] times more likely to have loss of sense of smell and 5.9 [3.8–9.3] times more likely to having loss of sense of taste. Using history of fever as a screening tool correctly picked up only 14.8% of all true positives of SARS-CoV-2 infection and failed to pick up 86.2% of positive cases. Using cough alone would detect 22.4% and miss 87.6%. Non-contact thermometer used alone, as a screening tool for COVID-19 at a cut-off of 37.8 would only pick 4.8% of positive SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Conclusion The use of fever alone or other symptoms individually [or in combination] as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection is not worthwhile based on ROC analysis. Use of temperature check as a COVID-19 screening tool to allow people into public space irrespective of the temperature cut-off is of little benefit in diagnosing infected persons. We recommend the use of facemask, hand hygiene, social distancing as effective means of preventing infection.

The effects of Covid-19 pandemic on food safety between Indonesia and Bangladesh: A comparative study

“…However, Stave et al (2021) reported that worksite temperature checking was ineffective for Covid-19 detection among workers and is not recommended. Similar findings were reported by Nuertey et al (2021) , that temperature screening is not worthwhile and they recommended the use of mask, hand hygiene, and social distance. To minimize the secondary infection of Covid-19 it is strongly recommended to prevent human-to-human Coronavirus transmission ( Lai et al, 2020 ).…”

Home-Based Remedies to Prevent COVID-19-Associated Risk of Infection, Admission, Severe Disease, and Death: A Nested Case-Control Study

“…Its spread was so rapid that, as at March 11, 2020, about 111 countries worldwide were affected, with more than one million cases leading to the World Health Organization (WHO) declaring it a pandemic [ 2 ]. Ghana recorded her index cases on 12 th of March 2020, and the country had recorded more than 127,000 cases as at end of September 2021 with more than 1150 mortalities [ 3 , 4 ].…”

Resuming NTD activities in the context of COVID-19: an investigation into the advantages of risk assessment processes to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19 during NTD delivery

“… 16 However, some programmes rely on measures such as temperature checks and symptom screening of patients and CDDs, which are less reliable methods of detection than COVID-19 tests. 17 It is also challenging when government willingness to promote safe practices during a pandemic is weak. The operational environment in Tanzania 18 meant that it was not possible to collect data on COVID-19 cases.…”