2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11167379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Communication- and Computation-Intensive SaaS on the OpenStack Cloud

Abstract: The pervasive use of cloud computing has led to many concerns, such as performance challenges in communication- and computation-intensive services on virtual cloud resources. Most evaluations of the infrastructural overhead are based on standard benchmarks. Therefore, the impact of communication issues and infrastructure services on the performance of parallel MPI-based computations remains unclear. This paper presents the performance analysis of communication- and computation-intensive software based on the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 1, Mobile Edge Computing is located at the side of the roadside unit. At the same time, the MEC server has much more computing resources than the vehicle local resources, which can provide a good solution to the time-delay sensitive problem of computation-intensive tasks [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1, Mobile Edge Computing is located at the side of the roadside unit. At the same time, the MEC server has much more computing resources than the vehicle local resources, which can provide a good solution to the time-delay sensitive problem of computation-intensive tasks [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured speedup values are close to those attained for relevant numbers of nodes on high latency 1 Gbps Ethernet networks as in parallel performance studies of DEM software. 9,15 Figure 2B presents weak scalability of the parallel software, when the increasingly larger problems are solved proportionally increasing the number of containers. Thus, benchmarks of 256,000, 500,000, 1,000,188, and 1,997,199 particles are solved on configurations of containers 1 × 4, 2 × 4, 4 × 4, and (5 + 3) × 4, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…benchmark for performance measurements. 9,15 The solution domain is assumed to be a cubic container with the 1.0 m-long edges. Half of the domain is filled with monosized particles, using a cubic structure.…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The article [8] compares the features of Docker virtualization to those of server virtualization, but does not provide a performance comparison. Articles [9], [10], [11] compare the performance of Docker and KVM systems. [12] compares the performance of Docker and LXD systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%