1998
DOI: 10.1177/107319119800500306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Children with Traumatic Brain Injury on the Cognitive Assessment System

Abstract: Children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were compared to a matched sample of neurologically normal children and adolescents on several measures of cognitive processing. Each of the children in the TBI group had experienced a closed head injury of moderate to severe magnitude. Participants in both the TBI (n = 22) and control (n = 22) groups ranged in age from 9 to 17 years and lived in the midwestern United States. They were all administered the Cognitive Assessment System (Naglieri & Das, 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reasonable to suspect that the CAS may have been insensitive to such effects. However, in previous studies, CAS scores were sensitive to retrospective parental reports of their children's frequency of SH (25) and to cognitive sequelae of closed-head injury (26). Administration of a battery including measures previously found to be sensitive to SH, along with the CAS, could clarify whether the present findings are specific to this battery or are more general.…”
Section: Sample Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is reasonable to suspect that the CAS may have been insensitive to such effects. However, in previous studies, CAS scores were sensitive to retrospective parental reports of their children's frequency of SH (25) and to cognitive sequelae of closed-head injury (26). Administration of a battery including measures previously found to be sensitive to SH, along with the CAS, could clarify whether the present findings are specific to this battery or are more general.…”
Section: Sample Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A total of 9 years of psychometric validation of the subtests preceded its standardization with a large, carefully stratified national sample of 3,072 youth (21)(22)(23). Previous studies have shown that the CAS is sensitive to parental retrospective reports of their children's histories of SH (25), to closed-head injuries in children (26), and to subtle processing deficits found in learning disabilities (23). The CAS domains of cognitive function and their associated subtests are described below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Gutentag, Naglieri, and Yeates (1998) study Matching Numbers successfully discriminated between demographically matched control and traumatically brain-injured children with anterior pathology (Levin et al, 1989). Matching Numbers also discriminated between a nondemented demographically matched control patient and a right-handed 65-year-old-male vascular dementia patient with an aneurysmal infarct in the left frontal lobe (McCrea & Scott, 2002).…”
Section: Matching Numbersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Performance on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test has been found to be significantly associated with neurodegeneration in the caudate in Huntington's disease (Starkstein et al, 1988;Sanchez-Pernaute et al, 2000) as well as with pathological symptoms associated with the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease (Starkstein, Bolduc, Preziosi, & Robinson, 1989). Gutentag (1998) found that Planned Codes demonstrated the most pronounced decrements in performance in the TBI child sample. Ryan, Atkinson, and Dunham (2004) found that Planned Codes was successful in measuring executive function in a large mixed-sex sample of mean age 20.…”
Section: Planned Codesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation