2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13173471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Camera-Based Vibration Monitoring Systems in Input-Output Modal Identification Using Shaker Excitation

Abstract: Despite significant advances in the development of high-resolution digital cameras in the last couple of decades, their potential remains largely unexplored in the context of input-output modal identification. However, these remote sensors could greatly improve the efficacy of experimental dynamic characterisation of civil engineering structures. To this end, this study provides early evidence of the applicability of camera-based vibration monitoring systems in classical experimental modal analysis using an el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LK algorithm [11] is the most popular algorithm used for optical flow estimation, but it is limited to tracking targets that have large motion between two consecutive frames. The most prevalent keypoints are extracted by the Harris corner detector [9,13], Shi-Tomasi corner detector [10,14], scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) algorithm [13], and speeded up robust features (SURF) algorithm [15,16]. However, not all sparse-optical-flow-based target tracking methods used for structural vibration monitoring implement outlier removal methods.…”
Section: Sparse Optical Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LK algorithm [11] is the most popular algorithm used for optical flow estimation, but it is limited to tracking targets that have large motion between two consecutive frames. The most prevalent keypoints are extracted by the Harris corner detector [9,13], Shi-Tomasi corner detector [10,14], scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) algorithm [13], and speeded up robust features (SURF) algorithm [15,16]. However, not all sparse-optical-flow-based target tracking methods used for structural vibration monitoring implement outlier removal methods.…”
Section: Sparse Optical Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancements in sensor technologies such as contact sensors 1 (e.g., fiber optic sensors, inclinometers, 1 School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China and strain gauges), wireless sensors 2 (e.g., accelerometers, acoustic sensors, smart materials, and microelectro-mechanical systems), and vision-based remote monitoring systems 3 (e.g., high-resolution cameras, action cameras, smartphones, consumer-grade cameras, unmanned autonomous vehicles, drones, and sonars) have facilitated the measurement and assessment of structures under various conditions. 4,5 In the last few years, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been mainly designed and applied in vibration-based damage detection tasks to directly extract the damagesensitive features from measured or simulated vibration data based on sensors and carry out pattern recognition of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the physically attached sensors may cause a mass-loading effect on lightweight targets, and they are difficult to affix to complex large-scale structures [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. As an alternative, the vision-based method is one of the most popular non-contact measurement methods for the structural modal analysis in recent years [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Compared with common contact sensors, camera-based devices are more flexible and provide a higher spatial-resolution sensing capacity, which makes them convenient for remote installation and preferable for full-field measurements [ 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%