1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(90)90157-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of boron/carbon first wall materials under fusion relevant conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. This testing facility is mainly used for thermal fatigue as well as for thermal shock experiments of carbon based beryllium and tungsten materials for divertor and first wall components of nuclear fusion devices …”
Section: The Electron Beam Test Facility Judithmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. This testing facility is mainly used for thermal fatigue as well as for thermal shock experiments of carbon based beryllium and tungsten materials for divertor and first wall components of nuclear fusion devices …”
Section: The Electron Beam Test Facility Judithmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a completely new and very fast testing method for ceramic refractory materials in vacuum by application of an electron beam testing facility is introduced, mainly to prevent any chemical reactions of tested materials with a test medium and to apply a fast thermal shock on heating (application relevant thermal stress state). Electron beam material testing facilities are already well known for tests of plasma facing components, which are used in nuclear fusion devices and consists of materials like beryllium, tungsten, or carbon‐based materials for plasma facing components . As already mentioned before, these testing facilities also offer an innovative method for thermal shock of ceramic refractories on heating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…---I -O 100 200 300 400 500 600 Time / s Fig. 4 Comparison of the temperatures of the mock-up with and without soft carbon sheet as an interlayer. The cooling conditions are a 2 MW/m2 heat flux and a 6 m3/h water flow rate sheet helped reduce the area of non-contact between the graphite tile and copper alloy, where the mode of heat transfer was not conducting but radiation; therefore effectively improved the thermal contact at the interface and lowered the temperature of the surface and shortened the cooling time.…”
Section: Heat Load Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition behveen the estimates (5) and 8[and (6) and (9)] occurs at the point where inequality (7) becomes equality.…”
Section: 'mentioning
confidence: 99%