2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7496(03)00024-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of bi-adhesive bonded aluminium lap joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest strength SLJ realized experimentally, at v c ¼ 0:2, is noted to be improved relative to both constant modulus cases across all the joint performance metrics: beyond the large strength increases, joint toughness and deflection at break are increased, while maintaining the joint stiffness of the (stiffest) constant modulus bondlayer assembly, i.e., across all relevant metrics, the v c ¼ 0:2 tailored joint is higher performing. Interestingly, several prior studies [44][45][46] demonstrated experimentally that a tailored joint can significantly outperform a constant modulus stiffer joint, but has only marginal merit compared to a (more) compliant joint. Our work shows significant improvements in both constant modulus cases with statistical significance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest strength SLJ realized experimentally, at v c ¼ 0:2, is noted to be improved relative to both constant modulus cases across all the joint performance metrics: beyond the large strength increases, joint toughness and deflection at break are increased, while maintaining the joint stiffness of the (stiffest) constant modulus bondlayer assembly, i.e., across all relevant metrics, the v c ¼ 0:2 tailored joint is higher performing. Interestingly, several prior studies [44][45][46] demonstrated experimentally that a tailored joint can significantly outperform a constant modulus stiffer joint, but has only marginal merit compared to a (more) compliant joint. Our work shows significant improvements in both constant modulus cases with statistical significance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designers work continuously in order to increase the strength of bonded joints. One of the approach to increase the strength is decreasing of joint stiffness in the external area of overlap by changing the geometrical parameters [6][7][8][9]. An engineering tool which allows the stress analysis of adhesive joints is finite element method (FEM) [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designers work continuously in order to increase the strength of adhesive joints. The approach to increase the strength of bonded joints is decreasing of joint stiffness in the external area of overlap by changing the geometrical parameters [6][7][8][9][10]. An engineering tool which allows the stress, strain and fatigue analysis of adhesive joints in engineering applications is finite element method (FEM) or boundary element method (BEM) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%