2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2007.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of beam-to-column joints in fire—A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 1 shows different forms of curve-fitting representation of joint's characteristics [4]. The reliability of the model is judged based on its ability to describe the entire behaviour of the joint.…”
Section: Curve-fit Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 1 shows different forms of curve-fitting representation of joint's characteristics [4]. The reliability of the model is judged based on its ability to describe the entire behaviour of the joint.…”
Section: Curve-fit Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…usually beneath composite floor) and the smaller surface area to volume ratio of the joint compared with the higher surface area ratio of the beam. Beam-to-column joints have been found to be of great significance in influencing structural behaviour at ambient and elevated temperatures [2,4]. Observations from full-scale fire tests and from damaged structures confirm that connections have a considerable effect on the survival time of structural members in fire due to their ability to distribute forces to the adjacent cool members [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EN 1993-1-2:2005(Al-Jabri et al, 2008, suggests temperatures at joints of between 62% and 88% of that in the beam lower flange temperature at mid-span. This is attributed to the additional material around joints (column, end-plate, concrete slab, etc.)…”
Section: Recent Advances On Modelling Of Steel and Composite Joints Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the sagging bending moment near the midspan is reducing, the hogging moment developed at the joint may increase to a level beyond its resistance (Liu, 1998). EN 1993-1-2:2005(Al-Jabri et al, 2008 suggests temperatures at joints of between 62% and 88% of that in the beam lower flange temperature at mid-span. This is attributed to the additional material around joints (column, end-plate, concrete slab, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%