2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10909-018-1974-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of an X-ray Microcalorimeter with a 240 μm Absorber and a 50 μm TES Bilayer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 shows that the detectors without bars have larger noise levels in the frequency band where the Johnson noise is dominant. This indicates that the M-factor is considerably higher here compared to that obtained from TESs with bars as reported in Tab.1 and consistent with those reported in [3,38].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…9 shows that the detectors without bars have larger noise levels in the frequency band where the Johnson noise is dominant. This indicates that the M-factor is considerably higher here compared to that obtained from TESs with bars as reported in Tab.1 and consistent with those reported in [3,38].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In these cases, the high M 2 observed in some bias points is balanced by a high α, with the ratio between these two scaling favorably for the higher bias frequencies. This balancing has been observed before in MoAu TESs under DC bias 52 . In Fig.…”
Section: Excess Noisesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The best energy resolution was achieved for TES8 with the 120×20 µm 2 geometry, where we found a full width at half maximum of 1.63 ± 0.17 eV. This is the best resolution ever achieved with a Ti/Au TES, and within 0.1 eV from the best energy resolution reported for a single pixel under DC bias 8,10,52 .…”
Section: X-ray Energy Resolution At 59 Kevsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We report here the results obtained with detectors developed both at NASA-Goddard and SRON, all based on bare TES's without the noise-mitigating normal metal structure. We will consider: microcalorimeters made of MoAu bi-layer TES's, with sizes of 50 × 50 µm and 100 × 100 µm, from a mixed 8 × 8 array fabricated at NASA-Goddard [10,13]; a 140 × 160 µm microcalorimeter with a TiAu TES, from a 5 × 5 [14]. The main properties of these detectors are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%