Abstract:ABSTRACT:The use of fuels for agricultural Diesel engines cycle, both of mineral origin (Diesel) or vegetable and animal origin (biodiesel) can significantly alter its performance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the change in torque, power and consumption of agricultural Diesel engine fuel using minerals and vegetables fuels. It was used a tractor power take-off coupled to a magnetic brake dynamometer (for measuring speed and torque for subsequent calculation of power), and a flow meter (for … Show more
“…The lower calorific value and the change in the behavior of the heat release during the combustion process are factors that highlight the need for engine adjustments to obtain a better performance and lower specific consumption with these fuels. The results follow the same trend as that reported by Perin et al (2017), who found that the specific consumption increased by 7.10% and 9.33% for B20 and B50, respectively, compared to B10. Godeša et al (2010), on the other hand, observed corresponding increases in the specific consumption of 1.25% and 2.5% for B20 and B30, respectively.…”
Diesel cycle engines are widely used in a wide range of agricultural activities. Recently, with the increasing use of biodiesel mixed with petroleum diesel and the introduction of pollutant emission regulations for agricultural and road machinery, there has been a growing migration from mechanical to electronic fuel injection systems. In this experiment, the primary aim was to verify the behavior of a diesel engine, electronically managed, with controlled variation of the fuel feeding system parameters (injection time and volume injected). A four-cylinder agricultural tractor with a turbocharged engine and a common rail electronic fuel injection system was used. Tests with diesel B10 and blends of 20 and 30% biodiesel were carried out, all with 10 ppm of sulfur and the injection system electronically reprogrammed. The tests were performed under full engine load from 1,300 to 2,000 rpm. The torque, power and fuel consumption were evaluated. Advancing the injection point increased the power and decreased the specific fuel consumption for all fuels. The greater amount of injected fuel provided average power gain of up to 14.96% and average torque gain of 15.50%.
“…The lower calorific value and the change in the behavior of the heat release during the combustion process are factors that highlight the need for engine adjustments to obtain a better performance and lower specific consumption with these fuels. The results follow the same trend as that reported by Perin et al (2017), who found that the specific consumption increased by 7.10% and 9.33% for B20 and B50, respectively, compared to B10. Godeša et al (2010), on the other hand, observed corresponding increases in the specific consumption of 1.25% and 2.5% for B20 and B30, respectively.…”
Diesel cycle engines are widely used in a wide range of agricultural activities. Recently, with the increasing use of biodiesel mixed with petroleum diesel and the introduction of pollutant emission regulations for agricultural and road machinery, there has been a growing migration from mechanical to electronic fuel injection systems. In this experiment, the primary aim was to verify the behavior of a diesel engine, electronically managed, with controlled variation of the fuel feeding system parameters (injection time and volume injected). A four-cylinder agricultural tractor with a turbocharged engine and a common rail electronic fuel injection system was used. Tests with diesel B10 and blends of 20 and 30% biodiesel were carried out, all with 10 ppm of sulfur and the injection system electronically reprogrammed. The tests were performed under full engine load from 1,300 to 2,000 rpm. The torque, power and fuel consumption were evaluated. Advancing the injection point increased the power and decreased the specific fuel consumption for all fuels. The greater amount of injected fuel provided average power gain of up to 14.96% and average torque gain of 15.50%.
“…As máquinas agrícolas são empregadas para realizar diversas operações ao longo do processo produtivo, sendo o combustível um fator que representa elevado custo aos produtores (PERIN et al, 2017). Diante desta conjuntura, a indústria de máquinas agrícolas busca o desenvolvimento e a implementação de novas tecnologias em seus motores que visam, principalmente, o aumento da eficiência e otimização de recursos, culminando com a redução dos níveis de emissões.…”
O trabalho teve como objetivo identificar, quantificar e classificar os sistemas de injeção de combustível, admissão de ar e o tipo de turboalimentação dos motores de tratores agrícolas comercializados no Brasil, entre os anos de 2021 e 2022. Com base nas informações técnicas do motor, fornecidas pelos fabricantes, foram analisados 297 modelos de tratores agrícolas segundo a potência nominal do motor. Os sistemas de alimentação de combustível foram classificados em injeção mecânica e eletrônica, e os sistemas de admissão de ar em aspirado e turboalimentado. Ademais, o sistema de turboalimentação foi subdividido em turbo wastegate, turbo duplo estágio e intercooler, turbo - intercooler, turbo de geometria variável, turbo - aftercooler e turbocomprimido. Verificou-se que os tratores agrícolas pertencentes às Classes II e III são equipados majoritariamente com motores de 4 cilindros, com predomínio do sistema de injeção mecânica de combustível (78%). Em relação ao total de modelos analisados, destaca-se o sistema de injeção eletrônica (52,19%) em detrimento ao sistema de injeção mecânica (47,81%). Os motores turboalimentados equipam 82,15% dos tratores agrícolas, sendo 100% em tratores com potência nominal superior à 73,5 kW. Logo, metade dos tratores agrícolas já conta com motores de sistema de injeção eletrônica de combustível, proporção que tende a aumentar à medida que este sistema for introduzido em tratores menores.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.