2009
DOI: 10.1504/ijams.2009.026199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of an add-drop-interchange heuristic for the capacitated facility location problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the local search-based Add [33] and Drop [19] heuristics, facilities are successively placed in or deleted from locations, dependent on some measures of suitability. In this way, different combinations of selected locations are checked in the search procedure [49].…”
Section: Modified Add and Drop Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the local search-based Add [33] and Drop [19] heuristics, facilities are successively placed in or deleted from locations, dependent on some measures of suitability. In this way, different combinations of selected locations are checked in the search procedure [49].…”
Section: Modified Add and Drop Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of lost sales has been rarely considered in the capacitated median problems. While respecting the capacity restrictions, the majority of related studies have assumed that there would be the possibility of covering all the demands using the available resources [28,34,49]. Harris et al [25] developed a bi-objective capacitated inventory-location model to minimize the environmental effects of established facilities and the financial costs simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers focus on repairing strategy and penalty function strategy which are the most frequently used for their efficiency. Actually, EABOP repairs its infeasible solutions by a specific repair operator which called DROP (Pritibhushan, 2009). It is a simple greedy algorithm (Kon & Tian, 2006;Chu & Beasley, 1998;Fox & Scudder, 1985) aims of obtaining a feasible solution x repaired by changing each bit x i infeasible [ ] (where i n = ...1 ) set to 1 to 0 as long as any constraint is violated.…”
Section: Repair Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a greedy algorithm (called ADD) aims at improving the fitness of feasible solutions. ADD method (Pritibhushan, 2009)…”
Section: The Improved Eabopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For feasible solution recovery methods, a restricted neighborhood search and a repeated-matching algorithm were studied (Hindi and Pienkosz, 1999;Holmberg et al, 1999) and a subgradient-based heuristic algorithm in conjunction with the volume algorithm and randomized rounding was developed (Barahona and Chudak, 2005). Also, Chen and Ting (2008) developed a hybrid algorithm which combined the Lagrangian heuristic and a multiple ant colony system in order to solve the single source capacitated facility location problem, and an add-drop-interchange heuristic presented by Sinha (2009) was used to improve a lower bound based on the LP-relaxation. Furthermore, Du et al (2010) proposed an approximation algorithm for the k-level CFLP that unified and extended several existing facility location problems and Sun (2012) developed an effective tabu search heuristic procedure for CFLP, as compared to the Lagrangian heuristic method with improved subgradient scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%