2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of AGR-1 high-temperature reactor fuel during post-irradiation heating tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In perspective of the overall AGR-1 fuel performance, the particles discussed in this study represent SiC failure fractions of 1.3×10 -5 during irradiation, 9.1×10 -5 during 1600°C safety testing, 4.8×10 -4 during 1700°C safety testing, and 1.4×10 -3 during 1800°C safety testing. It should also be noted that compacts were held for 300 or more hours at the maximum safety-test temperature [Morris et al, 2014] and time was a factor in the number of particles that released cesium due to SiC degradation. Failure fractions at 1700°C and 1800°C would have been lower for shorter test periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In perspective of the overall AGR-1 fuel performance, the particles discussed in this study represent SiC failure fractions of 1.3×10 -5 during irradiation, 9.1×10 -5 during 1600°C safety testing, 4.8×10 -4 during 1700°C safety testing, and 1.4×10 -3 during 1800°C safety testing. It should also be noted that compacts were held for 300 or more hours at the maximum safety-test temperature [Morris et al, 2014] and time was a factor in the number of particles that released cesium due to SiC degradation. Failure fractions at 1700°C and 1800°C would have been lower for shorter test periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cesium release from four particles with failed SiC was observed in the PIE of the graphite holders that surrounded the compacts in the irradiation test capsules [Demkowicz et al, 2014]; three of these particles were recovered for further analysis discussed below. Three particles released cesium during 1600°C safety testing, and numerous particles released cesium during safety testing at 1700 and 1800°C [Morris et al, 2014]; many of these were also recovered for analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the AGR-1 campaign, out-of-pile safety testing of individual compacts was performed to understand fuel performance at accident conditions and to test the margins of fuel performance. Individual compacts were exposed to temperatures ranging 1600-1800°C for exposure times of 300 hours or more while periodically measuring the release of select fission products, notably 110m Ag, 154 Eu, and 90 Sr [39]. These fission products were selected as they are radiologically [39].…”
Section: Irradiated Triso Fuel Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual compacts were exposed to temperatures ranging 1600-1800°C for exposure times of 300 hours or more while periodically measuring the release of select fission products, notably 110m Ag, 154 Eu, and 90 Sr [39]. These fission products were selected as they are radiologically [39].…”
Section: Irradiated Triso Fuel Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1.1. TRISO-coated fuel particles TRISO-coated fuel particle consists of a fissionable fuel kernel, which is surrounded by four coating layers [8,9]. Those four coating layers are porous pyrolytic carbon (PyC) buffer, dense inner pyrolytic carbon (IPyC), chemically vapour deposited silicon carbide (SiC), and dense outer pyrolytic carbon (OPyC), which are respectively designed from the kernel to the outside of each fuel particle as in Fig.…”
Section: Htgr Inherent Safety Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%