2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-019-1186-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a very high-resolution global forecast system model (GFS T1534) at 12.5 km over the Indian region during the 2016–2017 monsoon seasons

Abstract: A global forecast system model at a horizontal resolution of T1534 (∼12.5 km) has been evaluated for the monsoon seasons of 2016 and 2017 over the Indian region. It is for the first time that such a high-resolution global model is being run operationally for monsoon weather forecast. A detailed validation of the model therefore is essential. The validation of mean monsoon rainfall for the season and individual months indicates a tendency for wet bias over the land region in all the forecast lead time. The prob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the pattern correlations again fall quickly after 1 day lead time. The forecast obtained from this deep learning model is comparable with the same is from state of the art dynamical models such as provided in [8]. The forecast skill was also analysed using the ROC curve for homogeneous regions.…”
Section: Calculation Of Receiver Operating Characteristics (Roc) Curvementioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, the pattern correlations again fall quickly after 1 day lead time. The forecast obtained from this deep learning model is comparable with the same is from state of the art dynamical models such as provided in [8]. The forecast skill was also analysed using the ROC curve for homogeneous regions.…”
Section: Calculation Of Receiver Operating Characteristics (Roc) Curvementioning
confidence: 65%
“…The 3-day model forecast skill was meaningful but lower than the 1-day forecast in terms of correlation and RMSE performance relative to the Landsat reference. This is expected since the GFS predictions have generally lower performance with longer lead time [ 63 ]; larger uncertainties likely stem from a lack of satellite surface wetness observations closer to the forecast dates. The SMAP FW and SSM records were the two most important features in the 1-day forecast, which suggests that the background surface wetness level is generally crucial in determining how the coming precipitation affects short-term (e.g., 1 day) inundation changes and potential flood risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERA5 reanalysis is used to compare the meteorological variables other than precipitation. Downscaled outputs are also compared against high-resolution (12 km) deterministic forecast of Global Forecast System version 14 Mukhopadhyay et al (2019) (hereafter GFS-12km) which is used for short range prediction at IMD. The same initial conditions are used in this study for GFS-12km, raw-ERP and BC-D-ERP (Table 1).…”
Section: Observational and Verification Datamentioning
confidence: 99%