2021
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2021.2013950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a top-down excavation in shanghai: case study and numerical exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical characteristics of trough settlements are that the maximum settlements occur at a certain distance behind the wall, and the settlements gradually decrease to zero with increasing distance to the wall. According to previous studies [14,18,21,23,47], ground settlements caused by triangle-type wall movements and parabolic-type wall movements are in accordance with realistic responses of the ground to deep excavations.…”
Section: Distribution Patterns Of Ground Surface Settlement Under Dif...supporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical characteristics of trough settlements are that the maximum settlements occur at a certain distance behind the wall, and the settlements gradually decrease to zero with increasing distance to the wall. According to previous studies [14,18,21,23,47], ground settlements caused by triangle-type wall movements and parabolic-type wall movements are in accordance with realistic responses of the ground to deep excavations.…”
Section: Distribution Patterns Of Ground Surface Settlement Under Dif...supporting
confidence: 73%
“…In recent years, emphasis has been placed on the study of responses of existing properties to deep excavations. Several commonly used techniques to investigate deformation behaviors and the corresponding environmental effects of braced excavations are FEM analyses based on numerical tools [11][12][13][14][15][16], empirical/semiempirical methods based on field measurements [17][18][19][20][21][22]; or a published database [23][24][25][26], analytical solutions [27][28][29][30][31][32], and model tests [33,34]. In addition, machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms are becoming increasingly accurate and reliable in predicting elastic fields of soil around retaining walls under various scenarios of wall movements [35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make clear this influence, a further parametric study concerning the soil-wall contact was conducted. According to a previous study [14], the value range of ultimate side friction of cast-in-place piles is 15 kPa~100 kPa. In the current parametric study, a domain of 5 kPa~100 kPa for the values of τ max is considered.…”
Section: Influence Of the Shear Stress Limit τ Maxmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several approaches are generally used to conduct deformation analyses of deep excavations: simplified theoretical analyses (e.g., linear-and elastic-based close form approach, beam-spring approach, and limit equilibrium method), empirical/semi-empirical methods [3][4][5][6][7], laboratory tests [8][9][10][11][12], and numerical approaches [13][14][15]. Simplified theoretical methods are generally used to provide some basic understanding of the performance of deep excavations during the design, but they have many limitations because they are oversimplified [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the potential negative impacts of this type of work on neighboring buildings, it is necessary to evaluate the displacements that occur as a result of deep excavation. The aforementioned can be carried out using empirical and semi-empirical methods, laboratory tests, analytical methods and numerical simulations (Yang et al 2021). With the development of computers, the finite element method (FEM) is becoming one of the most widely used methods in geotechnical analyses of deep excavations (Chen et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%