2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a Developed TL-5 Concrete Bridge Barrier Reinforced with GFRP Hooked Bars: Vehicle Crash Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the parameters of the 10-ton truck specified in the "New Standard", the ls-dyna finite element simulation model was established by using the CAE preprocessing software hypermesh, and the simulation parameters were set by referring to the high-precision simulation model verified by the collision test [6][7][8][9][10]. Figure 3 In the simulation model, the boundary conditions of the model were set according to the standard collision conditions.…”
Section: Simulation Collision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the parameters of the 10-ton truck specified in the "New Standard", the ls-dyna finite element simulation model was established by using the CAE preprocessing software hypermesh, and the simulation parameters were set by referring to the high-precision simulation model verified by the collision test [6][7][8][9][10]. Figure 3 In the simulation model, the boundary conditions of the model were set according to the standard collision conditions.…”
Section: Simulation Collision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the characteristic compressive strength of concrete used for the barrier wall was 34.4 MPa . The barrier was crash tested using a tractor-trailer (Sennah and Mostafa, 2018), after which the barrier wall was tested under increasing applied load to failure to determine its structural behaviour, crack pattern and ultimate load-carrying capacity under equivalent static load simulating vehicle collision at the interior and end locations shown in Figure 3-5. To simulate these two load cases, the barrier wall was loaded at its end with a horizontal line-load at the height of 900 mm above the top surface of the asphalt and applied over a 2400 mm length.…”
Section: -64mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the characteristic compressive strength of concrete used for the barrier wall was 34.4 MPa . The barrier was crash tested using a tractor-trailer (Sennah and Mostafa, 2018), after which the barrier wall was tested under increasing applied load to failure to determine its structural behaviour, crack pattern and ultimate load-carrying capacity under equivalent static load simulating vehicle collision at the interior and end locations shown in Figure 3-5. To simulate these two load cases, the barrier wall was loaded at its end with a horizontal line-load at the height of 900 mm above the top surface of the asphalt and applied over a 2400 mm length.…”
Section: -64mentioning
confidence: 99%