Performance monitoring in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Nieuwenhuis, Sander; Nielen, M.; Mol, Nisan; Hajcak, Greg; Veltman, Dick J.

doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2005.02.005

Cited by 101 publications

(129 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

108

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fig. 1 depicts details of the duration of the trial, which are identical to previous studies using the same paradigm Nieuwenhuis et al 2002Nieuwenhuis et al , 2005.…”

Section: Task and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 85%

“…Trials with RTs <150 ms or >700 ms were excluded from the analyses (6.06 %, S.D.=5.44 % ; Nieuwenhuis et al 2002Nieuwenhuis et al , 2005. For the ERP analyses, single-trial epochs were extracted relative to the presentation of the feedback stimulus for the fERNs and relative to the response for the rERN.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In each experimental block, participants were presented with a new set of six different stimuli (for task and stimulus details, see Nieuwenhuis et al 2002Nieuwenhuis et al , 2005, that is two for each condition. The two stimuli from the 100 % condition mapped congruently to either the left or the right response button throughout the entire block.…”

Section: Task and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To investigate this, a probabilistic learning task was used in which participants learned stimulus-response mappings based on feedback about their performance (trial-and-error learning ; see, for example, Nieuwenhuis et al 2002Nieuwenhuis et al , 2005. A crucial aspect of the task is that the imperative stimulus presented on each trial differed in the degree to which the response was predictive of the value of the feedback (50, 80 and 100 %).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Neural correlates of error-related learning deficits in individuals with psychopathy

Borries

Brazil

Bulten³

et al. 2009

Psychol. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Psychopathy (PP) is associated with a performance deficit in a variety of stimulus-response and stimulus-reinforcement learning paradigms. We tested the hypothesis that failures in error monitoring underlie these learning deficits.Method. We measured electrophysiological correlates of error monitoring [error-related negativity (ERN)] during a probabilistic learning task in individuals with PP (n=13) and healthy matched control subjects (n=18). The task consisted of three graded learning conditions in which the amount of learning was manipulated by varying the degree to which the response was predictive of the value of the feedback (50, 80 and 100 %).Results. Behaviourally, we found impaired learning and diminished accuracy in the group of individuals with PP. Amplitudes of the response ERN (rERN) were reduced. No differences in the feedback ERN (fERN) were found. Conclusions.The results are interpreted in terms of a deficit in initial rule learning and subsequent generalization of these rules to new stimuli. Negative feedback is adequately processed at a neural level but this information is not used to improve behaviour on subsequent trials. As learning is degraded, the process of error detection at the moment of the actual response is diminished. Therefore, the current study demonstrates that disturbed error-monitoring processes play a central role in the often reported learning deficits in individuals with PP.

show abstract

“…Fig. 1 depicts details of the duration of the trial, which are identical to previous studies using the same paradigm Nieuwenhuis et al 2002Nieuwenhuis et al , 2005.…”

Section: Task and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 85%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Task and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Neural correlates of error-related learning deficits in individuals with psychopathy

Borries

Brazil

Bulten³

et al. 2009

Psychol. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Overactive error monitoring processes and increased ERN/Ne (but not Pe) amplitudes have, for example, been observed systematically in individuals with high levels of anxiety and/or negative affect (Aarts & Pourtois, 2010;Endrass, Klawohn, Schuster, & Kathmann, 2008;Gehring, Himle, & Nisenson, 2000;Hajcak, McDonald, & Simons, 2003aHajcak & Simons, 2002;Johannes et al, 2001;Moser, Moran, & Jendrusina, 2012;Nieuwenhuis, Nielen, Mol, Hajcak, & Veltman, 2005). In line with these studies, Luu, Collins and Tucker (2000) initially suggested that the ERN/Ne component may actually reflect the enhanced emotional significance of an error.…”

mentioning

confidence: 82%

Erroneous and correct actions have a different affective valence: Evidence from ERPs.

Aarts¹,

Houwer²,

Pourtois³

2013

Emotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The accuracy of actions is swiftly determined through specific monitoring brain systems. Event-related potential (ERP) studies have shown that error commission is associated with the generation of the error-related negativity (ERN/Ne), while correct actions with the correct-related negativity (CRN). Although the exact functional meaning of the ERN/Ne (and CRN) component remains debated, some authors have suggested that it reflects the processing of the emotional significance of actions. However, no study to date has directly linked amplitude changes at the level of the ERN/Ne-CRN to the affective processing of actions. In order to decode the emotional valence of actions performed during a Go/noGo task, we used an evaluative priming method in this study. After each action following the Go/noGo stimulus, participants had to categorize an evaluative word as either positive or negative. Behavioral results showed that response errors (i.e., False Alarms -FAs) performed during the Go/noGo task led to a faster categorization of negative than positive words.Remarkably, this evaluative priming effect was related to the magnitude of the ERN/Ne component generated during the Go/noGo task. Moreover, ERP results showed that the processing of evaluative words following FAs was influenced early on after word onset (early posterior negativity-EPN effect), while it was influenced later following correct as well as incorrect actions (late positive potential-LPP effect). Altogether, these ERP results suggest that the action-related ERN-CRN component encodes the perceived emotional significance of actions, such that early stages of evaluative word processing following these actions are influenced by this automatic process.3

show abstract

Neurophysiological Oscillations and Action Monitoring

Cohen¹

2017

The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Performance monitoring in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Cited by 101 publications

References 31 publications

Neural correlates of error-related learning deficits in individuals with psychopathy

Neural correlates of error-related learning deficits in individuals with psychopathy

Erroneous and correct actions have a different affective valence: Evidence from ERPs.

Neurophysiological Oscillations and Action Monitoring

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About