2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21952-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Modeling of the Consensus Mechanism in a Permissioned Blockchain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Candidates are a mid-state transiting from follower to leader. The whole Raft consensus can be CTMC GI/M/1 queue [104] PoW Bitcoin mean stationary number of txs in the queue and in the block M/G/1 queue variant [105] PoW Bitcoin confirmation time and tx delay non-exhaustive queue [106] PoW NA mean number of txs and mean confirmation time of txs in the system Discrete-time GI/GI N /1 queue [107] Proof-of-Authority Ethereum system queue size and tx waiting time M/M B /1 queue [71] BFT-SMaRt HLF tx latency M/G/1 and M/M/1 queue [108] PBFT NA system delay (n,k) fork-join queue [109] vote-based consensus permissioned blockchain blocks commitment delay, block validation response time and synchronization processes among mining nodes.…”
Section: A Markov Chains For Modelling Dlt Consensusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Candidates are a mid-state transiting from follower to leader. The whole Raft consensus can be CTMC GI/M/1 queue [104] PoW Bitcoin mean stationary number of txs in the queue and in the block M/G/1 queue variant [105] PoW Bitcoin confirmation time and tx delay non-exhaustive queue [106] PoW NA mean number of txs and mean confirmation time of txs in the system Discrete-time GI/GI N /1 queue [107] Proof-of-Authority Ethereum system queue size and tx waiting time M/M B /1 queue [71] BFT-SMaRt HLF tx latency M/G/1 and M/M/1 queue [108] PBFT NA system delay (n,k) fork-join queue [109] vote-based consensus permissioned blockchain blocks commitment delay, block validation response time and synchronization processes among mining nodes.…”
Section: A Markov Chains For Modelling Dlt Consensusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, this model is highly prevalent for performance modelling (e.g., estimating the sojourn time of jobs in the queues) of parallel and distributed systems. Recently, it has been found effective for use in studying the delay performance of the synchronization process of the vote-based permissioned blockchain systems [109]. A typical non-purging (n, k) fork-join queueing model is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: ) Queueing Models For Vote-based Consensusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2018) provides a taxonomy for blockchains, explains common blockchain consensus methods, analyzes blockchain applications, and explores technical problems as well as recent breakthroughs in addressing those challenges. Krieger et al (2019) investigate the effects of the most important design and load factors on the time it takes for new blocks to be committed to the blockchain after successful commitment choices and approval by the fully distributed consensus mechanism. A simplified example of a fully linked P2P graph using mean-value analysis techniques is used to demonstrate the suggested analysis of a permissioned blockchain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%