1981
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1981.1095060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Modeling for Packet Networks with Satellite Overflow Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What came to be a logical metric for such delays was the time taken by a data packet from start to finish; while the point of packet-switching design is that packets take different routes to their destination, aggregate measures of end-to-end travel time could speak to the network's average speed and capacity. (For similar uses, see Coviello [1979], Papantoni-Kazakos [1979], Lavia & Rhynas [1979], Yuill & Pickholtz [1981], Wong et al [1982], Girard & Ouimet [1983], Morling et al [1983] and Tobagi et al [1983].) A third descriptive use of the term referred to the network's capacity to handle some functions at the endpoints in the system.…”
Section: The Debate Over Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What came to be a logical metric for such delays was the time taken by a data packet from start to finish; while the point of packet-switching design is that packets take different routes to their destination, aggregate measures of end-to-end travel time could speak to the network's average speed and capacity. (For similar uses, see Coviello [1979], Papantoni-Kazakos [1979], Lavia & Rhynas [1979], Yuill & Pickholtz [1981], Wong et al [1982], Girard & Ouimet [1983], Morling et al [1983] and Tobagi et al [1983].) A third descriptive use of the term referred to the network's capacity to handle some functions at the endpoints in the system.…”
Section: The Debate Over Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%