2011
DOI: 10.1190/1.3657070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance measures in aeromagnetic compensation

Abstract: Aeromagnetic compensation is essential for the generation of highly accurate data in airborne geophysical surveys. Its objective is the removal of magnetic interference (or noise) in the signals, measured by magnetometer sensors, which is caused by the maneuvering of an aircraft flying within the Earth's magnetic field. These interference effects associated with the airframe of the aircraft, can be divided into three groups (Leliak, 1961): (a) permanent magnetism, from ferromagnetic parts in the aircraft; (b) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[]. Changes in the magnetic field resulting from aircraft maneuvers and heading changes were compensated for by compensation corrections [ Leliak , ; Noriega , ] derived with PEIComp software. Compensation coefficients were established from box patterns flown at high elevation in magnetically quiet regions located close to both Thule and Kangerlussuaq.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[]. Changes in the magnetic field resulting from aircraft maneuvers and heading changes were compensated for by compensation corrections [ Leliak , ; Noriega , ] derived with PEIComp software. Compensation coefficients were established from box patterns flown at high elevation in magnetically quiet regions located close to both Thule and Kangerlussuaq.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the accuracy of the estimated coefficients, the standard deviation of the residual interference can be used instead of the index improvement ratio [14]. The classic recursive least squares method is used here to estimate the coefficients.…”
Section: B Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While having advantages over other alternatives [21], e.g., the figure of merit [29], the standard deviation σ A cannot ensure the robustness of the estimated coefficients [4]. Thus, an additional flight consisting of the same maneuvers as the calibration flight is necessary [20], and only then, the robustness can be evaluated with the cross-calibration index [4] defined as…”
Section: A Test Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a calibration flight is required to acquire the scalar and vector magnetic field data to initially establish the system of linear equations. During the calibration flight, the aircraft typically needs to perform a series of maneuvers including rolls, pitches, and yaws along four orthogonal headings [21]. Since the maneuvers in different headings cannot alter the dip angle [5], the collected magnetic field data are incomplete to determine the true values of the coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%