The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance measures and input uncertainty for pedestrian crossing exposure estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the role of the other two components (i.e., exposure and risk of crash) remains uncertain, partially because it is difficult to determine the amount of exposure in pedestrians accurately (Clifton and Livi 2005 ; Keall 1995 ). Unlike previous studies (Keall 1995 ; Milligan et al 2013 ; Mindell et al 2012 ; Zhu et al 2013 ), we used a quasi-induced exposure method based on comparisons of the age and gender distribution of “innocent” pedestrians involved in clean collisions with age and gender in the whole population. In doing so, we took into consideration only the exposure windows in which pedestrians can be considered at fault or not at fault for a collision (i.e., while they are crossing or walking along a roadway), and therefore at risk of being struck by a vehicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the role of the other two components (i.e., exposure and risk of crash) remains uncertain, partially because it is difficult to determine the amount of exposure in pedestrians accurately (Clifton and Livi 2005 ; Keall 1995 ). Unlike previous studies (Keall 1995 ; Milligan et al 2013 ; Mindell et al 2012 ; Zhu et al 2013 ), we used a quasi-induced exposure method based on comparisons of the age and gender distribution of “innocent” pedestrians involved in clean collisions with age and gender in the whole population. In doing so, we took into consideration only the exposure windows in which pedestrians can be considered at fault or not at fault for a collision (i.e., while they are crossing or walking along a roadway), and therefore at risk of being struck by a vehicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the short-term count durations are increased, 90th percentile estimates reduce dramatically across all clustering approaches. Several other studies have also found greater accuracy from longer-duration counts (4,6,16). The relatively better performance of the EC approach may also be a case of overfitting, considering that these are in-sample tests.…”
Section: Short-term Period Expansion Accuracymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Efforts that have used qualitative methods are beginning to yield comprehensive information in regards to how pedestrians navigate pedestrian systems. Among the most successful strategies are surveys, such as the one in [13], field studies, such as the one in [14], [15], [16], and [17]. In addition, some of these efforts have given us methodologies to develop surveys and field studies protocols, such as [18] and [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%