2013
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance measurements in diabetes care: the complex task of selecting quality indicators

Abstract: Sets of quality indicators are diverse in number, content and definitions. This diversity reflects a lack of uniformity in the concept of diabetes care quality and hinders the interpretation of and comparison between quality assessments. Methodology regarding defining constructs such as the quality of diabetes care and indicator selection procedures is available and should be used more rigorously.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that blood glucose levels are recognized as indicators of quality in diabetes care, 40 , 41 it is relevant to know how Brazilian patients fare in this sense. A nationwide cross-sectional study, evaluating 5,750 T2DM patients attending the public health care system, was conducted between 2006 and 2011.…”
Section: Glycemic Control In Brazilian Patients With T2dmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that blood glucose levels are recognized as indicators of quality in diabetes care, 40 , 41 it is relevant to know how Brazilian patients fare in this sense. A nationwide cross-sectional study, evaluating 5,750 T2DM patients attending the public health care system, was conducted between 2006 and 2011.…”
Section: Glycemic Control In Brazilian Patients With T2dmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the available quality indicators for diabetes care measure whether risk factors are monitored and target levels are achieved, whereas few focus on the quality of prescribing . Indicators focusing on prescribing are more direct measures of actions of the healthcare professionals, and can be a meaningful addition in quality assessments to support providers to prescribe appropriately .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the composition of papers according to the studied conditions, of the 53 study papers, 18 evaluated the quality of care provided for cardiovascular disorders (33-50) and 12 evaluated cancer conditions (51-62). Eight assessed metabolic disorders and diabetes (63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70), six assessed acute infections (71)(72)(73)(74)(75)(76), three assessed orthopedic and trauma conditions (77)(78)(79), two assessed pediatric conditions (80,81), two assessed obstetric and gynecological conditions (82,83), one assessed asthma and allergic diseases (84), and one assessed geriatric conditions (85). The majority of the studies (51 in 53 articles) were carried out in high-income countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%