2005
DOI: 10.1177/0047287505278992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Measurement Systems in Tourism, Hospitality, and Leisure Small Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective

Abstract: In response to the United Kingdom’s government’s desire to improve the performance of tourism, hospitality, and leisure small medium-sized enterprises, this article analyzes the performance measurement processes within 10 best practice organizations. Related to contemporary approaches to improving business performance in the management literature, performance measurement approaches are analyzed using the balanced scorecard framework. An exploratory case study approach using the balanced scorecard as the theore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
110
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has highlighted that accounting-based measures are inadequate in service sectors (Phillips and Louvieris, 2005). Positive relationships have been found between hotel performance and external macroeconomic factors of market concentration (Pan, 2005); money supply (Barrows and Naka, 1994) and gross domestic product (Tang and Jang, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has highlighted that accounting-based measures are inadequate in service sectors (Phillips and Louvieris, 2005). Positive relationships have been found between hotel performance and external macroeconomic factors of market concentration (Pan, 2005); money supply (Barrows and Naka, 1994) and gross domestic product (Tang and Jang, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most organizations rely exclusively on financial performance measures to assess organizational performance (Neely, 1999;Hoque & James, 2000). Critics have argued that these measures are excessively profit-based (Brander Brown & McDonnell, 1995), short-term (Denton & White, 2000), unbalanced (Harris & Mongiello, 2001), unsatisfactory for businesses seeking a competitive advantage (Phillips, 1999;Evans, 2005), past oriented (Atkinson & Brander-Brown, 2001), little market oriented (Phillips & Louvieris, 2005), inadequate for strategic decisions (Kaplan & Norton, 1992), unable to measure value created, unable to measure intangible assets (Norreklit, 2000;Giannetti, Marelli & Vitali, 2002) and nonholistic (Phillips, 1999) and therefore, over reliance on them is no longer appropriate for today's managers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key marketing performance indicators include those for customer satisfaction, loyalty and perceived value to tourists, the contribution of marketing activities (e.g. marketing communications) to business results, brand equity and market position (Briggs, Sutherland, & Drummond, 2007;Fuchs & Weiermair, 2004;Kim & Kim, 2005;Phillips & Louvieris, 2005;Rust, Ambler, Carpenter, Kumar, & Srivastava, 2004;Sin, Tse, Chan, Heung, & Yim, 2006). The marketing group created a list of 22 marketing indicators.…”
Section: Conceptualisation and Operationalisation Of The Hsbmmentioning
confidence: 99%