2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1612931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Measurement of Pension Strategies: A Case Study of Danish Life Cycle Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are described as less and more risky regarding the parameters in which µ = 0.0004049 and σ = 0.015, 0.025, respectively. In the analysis, we follow a performance measurement methodology similar to the methodology (PM) stated in [34]. PM aims to compare the strategies with different risk profiles.…”
Section: Comparison Of Optimal Strategy With the Strategies Used In Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are described as less and more risky regarding the parameters in which µ = 0.0004049 and σ = 0.015, 0.025, respectively. In the analysis, we follow a performance measurement methodology similar to the methodology (PM) stated in [34]. PM aims to compare the strategies with different risk profiles.…”
Section: Comparison Of Optimal Strategy With the Strategies Used In Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM aims to compare the strategies with different risk profiles. In PM, the risk equivalent benchmark strategy of the corresponding strategy is searched for, and then the internal returns of these two strategies are compared [19,35]. For this purpose, we follow the procedure as follows:…”
Section: Comparison Of Optimal Strategy With the Strategies Used In Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, thereby, take two typical guarantees in traditional and innovative life insurance into account, which comprise cliquet-style and point-to-point guarantees. In this comparative overview, we consider the contributions by Gatzert and Schmeiser [26], Jørgensen and Linnemann [27], Faust, Schmeiser, and Zemp [28], Graf, Kling, and Russ [29], Gatzert [30], Guillé n et al [31,32], and Mahlow, Schmeiser, and Wagner [33]. Our study shows that there are two different approaches in the literature how to assess the performance of pension saving contracts with guarantees.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, tests for stochastic dominance are conducted (see, Gatzert and Schmeiser [26]; Graf, Kling, and Russ [29]). Guillé n et al [31] b Guillé n et al [32] a Notes: * tests for stochastic dominance are conducted; ** Faust, Schmeiser, and Zemp [36] provide a summary of Faust, Schmeiser, and Zemp [28] and thus they are omitted here; a cliquet-style guarantees are studied; b point-to-point guarantees are studied.…”
Section: Performance Measurement Of Pension Saving Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation