2008
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2008.4560217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance measure for Markovian switching systems using best-fitting Gaussian distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Φ(k) and ε(k) are chosen so that at each time step the distribution of x(k + 1) has the same mean and covariance under each system. Although it is clearly that the above approximation does not fully capture the characteristics of the distribution of the true target state, which may be multi-modal due to model switching, it is demonstrated in [15] that the corresponding moment-matched state distribution fits the true distribution well and can be used to provide predictive measures that is in close agreement with the performance of state-of-the-art multiple model estimator with a very low computational load, which is important in time critical scenarios. Let M j (k) denote the event that M k = j, the predicted model probability µ j ( k + 1| k) can be computed by…”
Section: Gaussian Fitting Of Target Dynamics Via Moment Matchingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Φ(k) and ε(k) are chosen so that at each time step the distribution of x(k + 1) has the same mean and covariance under each system. Although it is clearly that the above approximation does not fully capture the characteristics of the distribution of the true target state, which may be multi-modal due to model switching, it is demonstrated in [15] that the corresponding moment-matched state distribution fits the true distribution well and can be used to provide predictive measures that is in close agreement with the performance of state-of-the-art multiple model estimator with a very low computational load, which is important in time critical scenarios. Let M j (k) denote the event that M k = j, the predicted model probability µ j ( k + 1| k) can be computed by…”
Section: Gaussian Fitting Of Target Dynamics Via Moment Matchingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this paper, further focuses are devoted to prior threshold optimization for the maneuvering target tracking in clutter. Our work differs from that in [14] in that we compute the objective function of threshold optimization by approximating the multimodal prior target probability density function with a best-fitting Gaussian (BFG) distribution [15] at each time step to estimate the performance measure for tracking maneuvering targets with linear Markovian switching dynamics. A more reasonable and efficient adaptive detection threshold optimization method for maneuvering target tracking in clutter is proposed and extended to the case with the nonlinear measurement equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EBCRB has a disadvantage in that it ignores uncertainties in the mode sequence R i k . In situations where those uncertainties significantly deteriorate the performance of the unconditional estimator, the EBCRB will be far from the optimal performance, see [23], [24] for illustrating examples. In [20], another type of BCRB for JMSs was proposed, which assumed R i k unknown, but which is still sometimes more optimistic than the EBCRB.…”
Section: Enumeration Bayesian Cramér-rao Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For maneuvering target tracking, the jump Markov system (JMS) has proved to be an effective method, which switches among a set of candidate models in a Markovian fashion [20,21]. Pasha et al introduced the linear JMS into the PHD filters and derived a closed-form solution for the PHD recursion in [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%