There is inconclusive evidence as to how performance management is actually related to performance, particularly in subfields of the public sector where professional work prevails. We propose that the association between the use of performance information and performance of public sector professionals varies with the targets of management control. We test our hypotheses in the field of academic research, a prime example of professionalism in the public sector. The overall results of an online survey with 1,976 observations suggest that performance management is positively related to publication performance when performance information is used for the control of input targets. In contrast, we find negative associations of performance information with performance when used to control output targets. Public managers in professional fields should consider these countervailing relationships when they compose and use control systems. KEYWORDS input control; output control; performance measurement; universities; use of performance information Performance management is at the core of public sector reforms that have spread across many Western countries and beyond (Hood, 1991;Pollitt & Bouckaert, 2017). Public organizations increasingly produce performance information to support decisions by managers and policymakers, to drive learning behaviors of organizational members, and to give account to external stakeholders (Van Dooren, Bouckaert, & Halligan, 2015). It is almost a truism that an ultimate goal of performance management is the improvement of performance, although it may serve more purposes than that. If large enough, the beneficial effects on performance provide an economic justification for the considerable efforts and resources that it takes to implement and run performance management systems. A recent metastudy, however, found only weak or inconclusive evidence for positive relationships of performance management with actual performance in the public sector (Gerrish, 2015). none defined CONTACT Rick Vogel