Comparing performance management across contexts 169 the public sector context. As performance management has been expanding in these new directions, what does this mean for its linkage with other aspects of the HRM system?
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND HRMPerformance management is often seen as a microcosm of HRM, transferring the broader debate around the added value of human resource management to the performance management arena (Bach, 2000;Dewettinck, 2008). Special attention in both areas (HRM and performance management) is paid to alignment with the overall business strategy (strategic fit), alignment of practices towards a high-performance work system (horizontal or internal fit), line management involvement in the enactment of the practices, soft versus hard approaches (stressing the employee developmental side versus the individual performance side), and special attention to the search for interventions to increase firm performance. An ideal performance management system of practices is actually a sort of mini high-performance work system focused on goal setting, monitoring, appraising, developing, and rewarding employees in order to increase employee performance and to achieve organizational goals.However, this performance management system can take on many guises. Several authors emphasize the relevance of different contextual factors that affect the ideal system for an organization (Dewettinck, 2008;Haines III & St-Onge, 2012;van Dooren et al., 2015). These contextual factors may include industry characteristics, firm size, degree of unionization, the history of the organization, and private versus public sector organization factors. Most importantly here, they may also include potential country and national institutional and cultural differences affecting performance management in an organization in a specific geographical location.Claus and Briscoe ( 2008) present an overview of 64 articles published between 1985 and 2005 on employee performance management from an international perspective. The authors conclude that the academic literature on cross-border performance management is relatively atheoretical and exploratory in nature. They also conclude that the design and the substance of the empirical studies are weak. The majority of the empirical articles identified are focused upon or based upon performance management in multinational companies (e.g., Lam et al., 2002). Overall, Claus and summarize the following major themes and findings from their literature review: