2013
DOI: 10.1016/s2095-3119(13)60205-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance in Grain Yield and Physiological Traits of Rice in the Yangtze River Basin of China During the Last 60 yr

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
39
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This meant that the grain yield was directly determined by spikelets per unit area, which is consistent with a previous study [35]. An increased yield sink capacity is a premise to realizing higher yield [7,36], and the differential grain yield responses to the N rate and planting density can be explained primarily by the number of panicles per unit area and spikelets per panicle [7,[36][37][38]. In this study, the N rate and planting density had greater effects on panicles than spikelets per panicle ( Table 2); N improved the panicles mainly by promoting tillering, while planting density improved panicles mainly by increasing the number of basic seedlings, and the spikelets per panicle were restricted by the number of panicles [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This meant that the grain yield was directly determined by spikelets per unit area, which is consistent with a previous study [35]. An increased yield sink capacity is a premise to realizing higher yield [7,36], and the differential grain yield responses to the N rate and planting density can be explained primarily by the number of panicles per unit area and spikelets per panicle [7,[36][37][38]. In this study, the N rate and planting density had greater effects on panicles than spikelets per panicle ( Table 2); N improved the panicles mainly by promoting tillering, while planting density improved panicles mainly by increasing the number of basic seedlings, and the spikelets per panicle were restricted by the number of panicles [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…7). The increase in micronutrients from the 1950s to 1980s was partially due to improved micronutrient uptake [13,20]. However, the improvement in root uptake did not keep pace with the large increase in carbon assimilation capacity of super rice as reflected by the decreased of root activity during grain filling [21], causing the dilution in protein content in the grain from the 1980s to 2000s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, the average rice grain yield in China was more than 50% higher than the world average [11]. The Yangtze River Basin is the main rice planting area in China, and represents 51.2% of the total rice growing area and 51.3% of the total rice production in the country [12,13]. During the period, the yield potential has significantly improved [2,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether or not a larger root biomass and a stronger root activity would contribute to higher grain yield in rice remains an argument (Samejima et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2011). Earlier studies have showed that the rice root number, root weight, and root absorbing area were closely related with grain yield (Zhang et al, 2011(Zhang et al, , 2013Yang et al, 2012). The root activity (ROA, dehydrogenase activity and root bleeding sap), specific root activity per spikelet (ROA × root weight / total spikelets number), and spikelet-bleeding intensity (root bleeding/total spikelet number in given time) were significantly or very significantly and positively correlated with the grain filling rate, the percentage of filled grains, 1000-grain weight, and grain yield (Pan et al, 1996;Sun et al, 2002Zhang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%