2013
DOI: 10.1021/ja310456f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Improvement of Nanocatalysts by Promoter-Induced Defects in the Support Material: Methanol Synthesis over Cu/ZnO:Al

Abstract: Addition of small amounts of promoters to solid catalysts can cause pronounced improvement in the catalytic properties. For the complex catalysts employed in industrial processes, the fate and mode of operation of promoters is often not well understood, which hinders a more rational optimization of these important materials. Herein we show for the example of the industrial Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst for methanol synthesis how structure-performance relationships can deliver such insights and shed light on the role o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
215
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
15
215
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is schematically shown in Figure 1 and it comprises co-precipitation [24] and ageing [25][26] of a mixed Cu,Zn,(Al) hydroxy-carbonate precursor material [27], thermal decomposition yielding an intimate mixture of the oxides and finally activation of the catalyst by reduction of the Cu component [28]. The major trick of this synthesis is that under beneficial conditions the co-precipitated precursor material can be synthesized as a single homogeneous and well-defined precursor phase, zincian malachite (Cu,Zn) 2 (OH) 2 CO 3 , with a mixed cationic sub-lattice that contains all components of the catalyst and can even accommodate small amounts of the Al 3+ promoter [29] in a solid solution. This perfect distribution leads to an effective dilution of the active Cu component and is the basis for a successful nano-structuring of the precursor upon decomposition into CuO/ZnO and for the high Cu/ZnO-interdispersion in the final reduced catalyst.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Technical Methanol Synthesis Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is schematically shown in Figure 1 and it comprises co-precipitation [24] and ageing [25][26] of a mixed Cu,Zn,(Al) hydroxy-carbonate precursor material [27], thermal decomposition yielding an intimate mixture of the oxides and finally activation of the catalyst by reduction of the Cu component [28]. The major trick of this synthesis is that under beneficial conditions the co-precipitated precursor material can be synthesized as a single homogeneous and well-defined precursor phase, zincian malachite (Cu,Zn) 2 (OH) 2 CO 3 , with a mixed cationic sub-lattice that contains all components of the catalyst and can even accommodate small amounts of the Al 3+ promoter [29] in a solid solution. This perfect distribution leads to an effective dilution of the active Cu component and is the basis for a successful nano-structuring of the precursor upon decomposition into CuO/ZnO and for the high Cu/ZnO-interdispersion in the final reduced catalyst.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Technical Methanol Synthesis Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the presence of Al on the catalyst activity has been studied by Bahrens, et al [4]. The best concentration of Al was about 3-4% of the mass fraction of Al to (Cu+Zn+Al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commercial MSR catalyst Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 contains a high loading of Cu and ZnO and a relatively lower amount of Al2O3 [12]. The ZnO improves the dispersion and redox properties of copper and is responsible for strong metal support interaction [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ZnO improves the dispersion and redox properties of copper and is responsible for strong metal support interaction [13,14]. Alumina is shown to have structural and electronic promotional effect on ZnO by inducing lattice defect and increasing its reducibility [12]. In general, the addition of Al2O3 leads to the improvement of surface area of the support [11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%