2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-020-00324-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Improvement of Feature-Based Fault Classification for Rotor System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 lists the experimental results. Under Normal, Rubbing, Unbalance, and Misalignment conditions, the proposed methods showed better performance than the existing methods [3,5]. In this study, an attempt was made to improve performance through k-fold cross-validation, but the following problems were encountered.…”
Section: Experiments Results 31 Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 lists the experimental results. Under Normal, Rubbing, Unbalance, and Misalignment conditions, the proposed methods showed better performance than the existing methods [3,5]. In this study, an attempt was made to improve performance through k-fold cross-validation, but the following problems were encountered.…”
Section: Experiments Results 31 Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At this time, to demonstrate the superiority of the methods used in this experiment, they were compared with one of the most commonly used methods, the method of applying SVM (Support Vector Machine), after feature selection based on the GA (genetic algorithm) after extracting the hand-crafted features from a raw signal and [3]. The [3] method is a method of applying SVM by mixing a GA and PCA (Principal Component Analysis) from a list of hand-crafted feature values through feature engineering. The proposed methods were also compared with the MLP (Multi-Layer Perceptron) method [5] from the same feature engineering [3] to determine if it shows better performance in training after data visualization.…”
Section: Experiments Results 31 Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations