Performance Evalution of MANET Routing Protocols using Reference Point Group Mobility and Random WayPoint Models

Murty, Mahesh S.; Das, M Venkat

doi:10.5121/ijasuc.2011.2104

Cited by 15 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We have observed that, though there is a significant difference between AODV and DSR protocol [8,9,10,11]but by varying a transmission range in between them is not yet analyzed and obtain high throughput. So we have focused on the performance of the protocol by changing a communication range and compute the performance metrics such as packet delivery ratio, average end to end delay, throughput and packet loss [12,13,14].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

QoS Enhancement by varying Transmission Range in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks

Arivubrakan¹,

Dhulipala²

2012

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ad-hoc network is an infrastructureless network which consists of a set of nodes, communicate over a transmission radio. It does not require any central administration. In this paper, we evaluate some of the widely used efficient routing protocols with varying transmission range of the node. Data transmitted by a node is received by all the nodes within its communication range. We focus on the analysis of varying a range of the transmission in terms of distance. The proposed evaluation was made on routing protocols such as AODV and DSR, which are simulated in Network Simulator (ns2) .The performance of these protocols, is analyzed with selected metrics.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

QoS Enhancement by varying Transmission Range in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks

Arivubrakan¹,

Dhulipala²

2012

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has classified in [20][21][22][23][24] as the fraction among the amount of packets created with the application layer. It has the fraction of data packets send to the target to those created from the starting point.…”

Section: Packet Delivery Ratio (Pdr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Mobility Models Using Routing Protocols

2017

IJMTER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The major trademark which separates Ad hoc wireless network from different remote or wired systems is portability. Hence, Ad hoc wireless network directing conventions are intended to adaptively provide food for dynamic changes in topology while boosting throughput and parcel conveyance proportion, and limiting postponement, steering burden and vitality utilization. A noteworthy outline issue for a productive and compelling steering convention for genuine Ad hoc wireless networks is, in this manner, to accomplish ideal estimations of execution parameters under system situations where hubs are subjected to various sorts of versatility that progressively change the system topology. Our simulative investigation on Ad hoc wireless network directing conventions and portability models expects to decide the execution of current Ad hoc wireless network steering conventions as for different versatility models actualized in ns-2. We think about versatility models including DSR. The consequences of our broad system reproductions are classified alongside a far reaching investigation. The exertion permits a reasonable correlation of the abilities and restrictions of various sorts of versatility designs and their reasonableness for contemporary specially appointed remote Networks Mobility Models utilizing DSR Routing conventions.

show abstract

“…Timcenko et al [19] considered RPGM, RWP, GM and MGM mobility models with AODV, DSDV and DSR routing protocols to study PDR and delay.Murthy and Das [20] used varying number of nodes and node speeds, RWP and RPGM mobility models, and AODV and DSR protocols to compare PDR, delay and throughput. Mann and Mazhar [21] suggested the protocol to use for given mobility model, MANET area and other parameters. Barakovic et al [22] created node mobility scenario, varied pause time of the nodes, and did performance evaluation for DSDV, AODV and DSR routing protocols.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterizing Node Mobility in MANETs

Shukla¹,

Mishra²,

Banerjee³

2017

IJMTER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-In their previous work the authors had studied various combinations of MANET routing protocols and mobility models. The parameters of performance evaluation varied significantly with the choice of mobility models. Guided by these results, a new hybrid mobility model is proposed which appears more natural in a setting where MANETs are used. This hybrid model combines Reference Point Group Mobility (RPGM) in the initial phase, followed by the Random Waypoint Mobility (RWP) in the second phase. The hybrid model is tested with the three widely used routing protocols, DSDV, AODV and DSR, for varying MANET areas. The performance metrics used are Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), end to end delay and throughput. The NS-2 simulation tool is used for the study. The results for the hybrid model are compared with the results for the RWP model, which is the default mobility model for MANETs. It is found that the hybrid model performed much better than RWP on all performance parameters, suggesting its use as a default mobility model in MANETs.

show abstract

Performance Evalution of MANET Routing Protocols using Reference Point Group Mobility and Random WayPoint Models

Cited by 15 publications

References 0 publications

QoS Enhancement by varying Transmission Range in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks

QoS Enhancement by varying Transmission Range in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks

Evaluation of Mobility Models Using Routing Protocols

Characterizing Node Mobility in MANETs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About