Proceedings of the 29th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 201 2016
DOI: 10.33012/2016.14554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluations of an Equatorial GPS Amplitude Scintillation Detector Using a Machine Learning Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the manual annotation is considered as the reference ground truth for the detection performance analysis. The same approach has been used also in other works relying on machine learning for scintillation detection [17], [18].…”
Section: A Description Of Traditional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, the manual annotation is considered as the reference ground truth for the detection performance analysis. The same approach has been used also in other works relying on machine learning for scintillation detection [17], [18].…”
Section: A Description Of Traditional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach relies on external data sources and instruments, which are not always available. A technique based on supervised machine learning Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm has been proposed for amplitude scintillation detection in [17] and [18]. This method has been extended to phase scintillation detection in [19] and [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear strategy envisages the use of high‐level observables, including the amplitude‐ and phase‐scintillation indices, the signal CN0, and the satellites' elevation and azimuth. This was first done exploiting SVM for the detection of amplitude scintillation in Jiao, Hall, and Morton (2016) and Jiao, Hall, and Morton (2017a). The algorithm was trained using a large amount of real scintillation data, manually labelled, and showed detection accuracy in the range 91‐96%, outperforming other triggering systems analyzed.…”
Section: Scintillation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A technique based on the SVM algorithm has been suggested for amplitude scintillation detection [148], [149], and then later expanded to phase scintillation detection [150], [151].…”
Section: F Ionospheric Scintillation Detectingmentioning
confidence: 99%