SAE Technical Paper Series 1999
DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-1967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluations of an Advanced Space Suit Design for International Space Station and Planetary Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenges in designing an inflatable pressure suit for life support often lie in the balance between maintaining the required internal pressure/shape of the suit and in providing the suited subject enough mobility to complete their assigned tasks. While the current suit performs well in zero gravity, a different type of suit will be required to meet the astronaut's needs for planetary surface exploration and for improved productivity in zero gravity operations of the future [3]. In this light, ILC Dover, Inc. has been developing the I-Suit, an advanced, high-mobility suit that incorporates enabling technology enhancements (Figure 3).…”
Section: Extravehicular Activity Space Suitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges in designing an inflatable pressure suit for life support often lie in the balance between maintaining the required internal pressure/shape of the suit and in providing the suited subject enough mobility to complete their assigned tasks. While the current suit performs well in zero gravity, a different type of suit will be required to meet the astronaut's needs for planetary surface exploration and for improved productivity in zero gravity operations of the future [3]. In this light, ILC Dover, Inc. has been developing the I-Suit, an advanced, high-mobility suit that incorporates enabling technology enhancements (Figure 3).…”
Section: Extravehicular Activity Space Suitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mobility of hip joints of the Apollo space suit was less than desired [3,8,9]. This shortcoming can be eliminated in a next-generation PSS.…”
Section: Hip Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSS enclosure construction must allow the suited crewmember to rise/stand up after falling. Tests performed both in Russia [6] and the USA [8,9] show that prior to rising/standing on a level surface, the suited crewmember must take a prone position. When tested at the Zvezda test facility (1/6g), the suited crewmember was able to stand up by proceeding through the following motions: pushing off with his hands and moving his torso backward to a kneeling position and rising from the kneeling to the standing position by any of several techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Apollo and shuttle EMUs). A 1999 study by ILC Dover [11] pitted these three suits against each other, to compare their range of motions, actuation torques, and ease in performing routine tasks (e.g. walking on a treadmill, rising from a prone or supine position).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%