Performance evaluation on supplier collaboration of agricultural supply chain

Zhu, Yanxin; Lee, Su-Jian; Zhang, Jieqing

doi:10.1504/ijiscm.2016.077948

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Increase stakeholders' resilience [63,66,68,72,79,84,90,98,107,112,121,152] Leadership collaboration Improve performance through collaborate strategic plan [78,110,124] Strengthening Public-Private partnership mechanisms More flexibility and efficiency for CCAFs, attract investment; stable development. [71,103,104,106,120,153] Improving client satisfaction Enhancing product's quality and specification Reduction in delivery time, increase customer's demand and satisfaction Client and environment-oriented [132,154] Applying safety standards Greener CCAFs [104,151] Table 4.…”

Section: Increase Level Of Integration In Ccafsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review

Nguyen

Hong

et al. 2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaboration in a supply chain continuously proves its role in increasing the performance of supply chains, which attracts the attention of both academia and practitioners, specifically, how to generate higher impacts of collaborative partnership on the performance of supply chains and measure them. In cold supply chains of agriculture and foods, the vital need for collaboration becomes even more significant to improve the performance. Therefore, this paper reviews relevant articles derived from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. Via the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), the research team classifies the types of collaborative partnership in cold agriculture and food supply chains, issues of the literature when analyzing collaboration impacts on the performance of CSCs of agriculture and foods, and finally, the opportunities for the future research to boost the collaboration practices in these cold chains. Following this sequence, 102 articles were eventually extracted for the systematic review to identify themes for not only addressing the review questions but also highlighting future research opportunities for both development of partnership integration and performance of the cold chains of agriculture and foods.

show abstract

Section: Increase Level Of Integration In Ccafsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review

Nguyen

Hong

et al. 2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…By examining major large-scale agricultural cold chain logistics companies in Chongqing, China, Chen and Zhou [2] identify numerous issues that have to be addressed, ranging from improving the cold chain logistics infrastructure, establishing an information exchange platform, and building a new cold chain logistics framework catered for the Internet era. Zhu et al [3] determine the key influencing factors of the coordination performance from such aspects as product competitiveness, communication, operations, and information-sharing capability. ey then employ a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate agricultural suppliers' synergy performance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Two-Echelon Agricultural Product Supply Chain with Freshness and Greenness Concerns: A Cost-Sharing Contract Perspective

Tan¹,

Tu²,

Wang³

et al. 2020

Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agricultural products are basic needs of human beings, and whether they are cultivated in a green (or organic) manner has direct impact on environment and public health. This research incorporates product freshness and greenness into a two-echelon agricultural product supply chain (APSC). Game theoretic analyses are carried out to examine pricing, freshness, and greenness decisions of the supply chain members with and without cost-sharing for greenness investment. Subsequently, we conduct comparative and sensitivity analyses for these optimal decisions and profits of the APSC members under different cases. Numerical experiment is employed to investigate the impact of key parameters on equilibrium decisions and profitability. Analytical and experimental results show that the cost-sharing contract of greenness investment for agricultural products helps to strengthen the supply chain members’ effort in improving the greenness and freshness levels of the agricultural product, thereby enhancing both individual and channel profitability of the APSC under certain conditions. This research also reveals a widened profit gap between the producer and the retailer under the cost-sharing contract.

show abstract

Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Group Decision Making in Supplier Performance Evaluation

Seth

Gupta

Muhuri

2018

2018 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Performance evaluation on supplier collaboration of agricultural supply chain

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review

Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review

A Two-Echelon Agricultural Product Supply Chain with Freshness and Greenness Concerns: A Cost-Sharing Contract Perspective

Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Group Decision Making in Supplier Performance Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About