Performance Evaluation of Vehicular DTN Routing under Realistic Mobility Models

Competition and Cooperation between Nodes in Delay Tolerant Networks with Two Hop Routing

“…Such networks have been developed in recent years and adapted both to human mobility where the contact process is between pedestrians [5], as well as to vehicle mobility [7].…”

DTN Protocols for Vehicular Networks: An Application Oriented Overview

“…In [46], nodes exchange a copy of the messages with a probability smaller than 1, which reduces the number of copies in the network. Protocols such as MaxProp [30], RAPID [47], POR [48], and DAER [49] add message priority management techniques to make the most of every contact. We will go into detail about these techniques in Section III-D. • The Spray&Wait protocol [44] divides the propagation of messages into two different phases.…”

“…Moreover, it does not solve the problems arising from large-sized messages. This redundancy mechanism is much more common and is used in the following protocols: Epidemic [24], PRoPHET [25], Spray&Wait [44], MaxProp [30], RAPID [47], DAER [49], POR [48], ADPBSW [50], DTFR [65], GeoSpray [51], RENA [66] and CAN DELIVER [72].…”

Improving Message Dissemination in Opportunistic Networks

“…In the same context using another trace set of 4,000 taxis, the author of [99] validated the collected data, and created their own mobility model called Shanghai Urban Vehicular Network (SUVnet).…”

“…The authors of [99] used another trace set of 4,000 taxis, validating the collected data, and creating their own mobility model called Shanghai Urban Vehicular Network (SUVnet). They evaluated message diffusion performance by comparing through simulation two different DTN routing protocols: the non-geographic pure Epidemic routing and their new proposed geographic DTN routing, the DistanceAware Epidemic Routing (DAER).…”