Performance evaluation of two PV technologies (c-Si and CIS) for building integrated photovoltaic based on tropical climate condition: A case study in Malaysia

Performance Analysis and Comparison of Different Photovoltaic Modules Technologies under Different Climatic Conditions in Casablanca

“…During the rainy day the efficiencies are minimal for the three technologies due to the low solar irradiation and the rain [19].…”

Experimental and deep learning artificial neural network approach for evaluating grid-connected photovoltaic systems

“…Rotogeropoulos et al, Komoni et al, Tripathi et al, and Humada et al [14][15][16][17] evaluated the performance of many PV modules attached to the grid. Rotogeropoulos et al 14 concluded that the use of monocrystalline/noncrystallized silicon technology is the best technique that can be linked to a grid.…”

“…Humada et al 17 found that the copper-indiumdelineated (CIS) cells system generated more energy with a higher efficiency ratio than a monocrystalline cell system. Kumar and Malvoni 18 demonstrated that the PV system with 1006.74 kW of crystalline silicon (c-Si) PV cells (installed in semi-arid climates in India) has deteriorated based on observation data.…”

Review of distributed generation (DG) system planning and optimisation techniques: Comparison of numerical and mathematical modelling methods

“…Deployment of these technologies therefore implies long payback period (typically more than a decade), and this makes their investment less appealing. For instance, payback periods required for financing solar PV system in Malaysia and India were found to be 28.44 years [86] and 36 years [87]. In another techno-economic assessment in United Kingdom, hybrid solar PV/solar thermal (PVT) system was found to have payback period of 9-11 years [88].…”