1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00364960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of two new disk scheduling algorithms for real-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that EDF only prioritizes requests based on the proximity to the deadline. Therefore, requests might make little progress until it is too late [14]. On the other hand, LSTF also factors in the remaining service time which can be estimated because of Wisp's progress metrics.…”
Section: System Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that EDF only prioritizes requests based on the proximity to the deadline. Therefore, requests might make little progress until it is too late [14]. On the other hand, LSTF also factors in the remaining service time which can be estimated because of Wisp's progress metrics.…”
Section: System Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most traditional disk scheduling algorithms, such as FCFS, SCAN, C-SCAN, LOOK, C-LOOK, and SSTF are designed to reduce disk-seek time and increase its throughput [2,3,4]. FCFS algorithm performs operations in order the task arrives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [12] present a model for a scheduling algorithm that only minimises seek time. Shriver et al [13] define the distance (in terms of number of bytes) between two random requests with minimised positioning time as no of Cylinders × Bytes per Cylinder…”
Section: B Models Of Disk Head Positioning Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%