2018 International Conference on Radar (RADAR) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2018.8557240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Two Multistatic Radar Detectors on Real and Simulated Sea-Clutter Data

Abstract: In this paper we evaluate the performance of two multistatic radar detection schemes on real and syntheticallygenerated sea clutter data. The analysis utilizes both monostatic and bistatic radar data, simultaneously collected by the nodes of the NetRAD system. The first contribution is a demonstration of how the evolved Doppler spectrum model can accurately simulate multistatic sea-clutter with statistical and spectral properties which match the real data. The second contribution is an analysis of the detectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…- 15 approximately distributed as a Gaussian random variable with mean μ CO-LRT and variance Σ CO-LRT , where these statistics can be characterised as summations over Q frequencies, as follows:…”
Section: Appendix B Distribution Of the Tr-lrt Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…- 15 approximately distributed as a Gaussian random variable with mean μ CO-LRT and variance Σ CO-LRT , where these statistics can be characterised as summations over Q frequencies, as follows:…”
Section: Appendix B Distribution Of the Tr-lrt Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, with the wide geometric separation between sensors, the target statistics can be regarded as independent from sensor to sensor [10,11]. However, in many practical situations, the scattering between different sensors may be correlated, for example, the micro-Doppler of human [12] and drone [13], and the clutter [14][15][16]. Nevertheless, multistatic radar still outperforms monostatic radar due to additional information [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%