2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04667-4_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Stereo Algorithms for Automotive Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal was to publish large datasets to support other researchers to verify and evaluate their algorithms. An evaluation strategy for stereo algorithms on large amounts of images was also proposed in [36]. In that publication a performance evaluation scheme and corresponding metrics were suggested.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Computer Vision Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The goal was to publish large datasets to support other researchers to verify and evaluate their algorithms. An evaluation strategy for stereo algorithms on large amounts of images was also proposed in [36]. In that publication a performance evaluation scheme and corresponding metrics were suggested.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Computer Vision Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main aim of our evaluation framework is to provide an automatic method for evaluating and optimizing different stereo and flow algorithms over a large dataset [36]. By now, it has proved its strength to be well suited for all kind of image processing tasks.…”
Section: Evaluation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other methods, in practice, SGM appears rather robust and insensitive to the choice of parameters. This makes it suitable for real world applications like tile-wise aerial image matching (Hirschmüller, 2008) (Gehrke et al, 2010) and automotive applications (Steingrube et al, 2009). The SGM describes a very efficient approximation method to find the minimum of a global energy function based on the input images.…”
Section: Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to produce a quantitative estimation of the algorithm performance two of the three metrics presented in [16] have been computed on a 1000 frames sequence acquired in the downtown of Kiev (Ukraine) on August, 5, 2010 approximately at 14:00 local time. While this data represents only a tiny fraction of the whole trip it is quite representative of typical driving conditions in city traffic.…”
Section: A Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second metric is the leader vehicle lateral position measurement, defined as m l p = |l p measure −l p groundtruth |, with the ground truth being generated by direct LIDAR measurements of the preceding vehicle. Table II contains the computed values, both for the correlation-based and SGM stereo matching algorithms; as a reference, the values reported in [16] have also been inserted in the table, although they refer to a different dataset. The results are very similar; only the m f c value for the SGM reconstruction case changes significantly, probably because of the different amount of data the test has been run on.…”
Section: A Performancementioning
confidence: 99%