2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of spectral vegetation indices using a statistical sensitivity function

Abstract: A great number of spectral vegetation indices (VIs) have been developed to estimate biophysical parameters of vegetation. Traditional techniques for evaluating the performance of VIs are regression-based statistics, such as the coefficient of determination and root mean square error. These statistics, however, are not capable of quantifying the detailed relationship between VIs and biophysical parameters because the sensitivity of a VI is usually a function of the biophysical parameter instead of a constant. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
2
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In doing so the aim is the identification of an analytical relationship between on-the-ground AGB estimates and spectral indices sensitive to photosynthetically active radiation and scaling with amount of biomass [39][40][41][42]. A vegetation index is generally derived from the spectral reflectance of two or more bands, and proportional to the value of biophysical parameters like leaf area index (LAI), net primary productivity (NPP), and absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) [43]. The choice of adequately performing indices (VIs) and satellite data type depends on the scale of analysis, type of ecosystem and environmental conditions, vegetation density, spectral information available, and the nature of the field information available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so the aim is the identification of an analytical relationship between on-the-ground AGB estimates and spectral indices sensitive to photosynthetically active radiation and scaling with amount of biomass [39][40][41][42]. A vegetation index is generally derived from the spectral reflectance of two or more bands, and proportional to the value of biophysical parameters like leaf area index (LAI), net primary productivity (NPP), and absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) [43]. The choice of adequately performing indices (VIs) and satellite data type depends on the scale of analysis, type of ecosystem and environmental conditions, vegetation density, spectral information available, and the nature of the field information available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RVI, the first ratio-based vegetation index described by Jordan (1969), is a very similar index to NDVI but with higher sensitivity to dense forests. RVI has been found to have the highest sensitivity when LAI is greater than 1.8, while NDVI has the highest sensitivity when LAI is less than 1.8 (Ji and Peters 2007). Therefore, RVI may better differentiate levels of damage to wind-disturbed forests, as opposed to timber harvesting or fire disturbed forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were irregular high and low EVI values between the three vegetation. The variability in the EVI values of the three vegetation (high and low values), especially during defoliation stage of rubber trees suggests that as compared to EVI, NDVI is more sensitive to low-density canopy and EVI is more sensitive to high-density canopy (Ji & Peters 2007). The performance of EVI metrics used in this study was slightly increased with the increased in the amount of foliage cover starting from rubber trees' foliation period to their growing period.…”
Section: Computed Vegetation Indices Of Rubber Evergreen and Oil Palmentioning
confidence: 68%