2021
DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7070116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Source Camera Attribution by Using Likelihood Ratio Methods

Abstract: Performance evaluation of source camera attribution methods typically stop at the level of analysis of hard to interpret similarity scores. Standard analytic tools include Detection Error Trade-off or Receiver Operating Characteristic curves, or other scalar performance metrics, such as Equal Error Rate or error rates at a specific decision threshold. However, the main drawback of similarity scores is their lack of probabilistic interpretation and thereby their lack of usability in forensic investigation, when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a strategy that could be optimal both in presence of EIS and not is difficult to be achieved. In fact, the literature [ 21 , 31 ] shows that for non-stabilized videos, the optimal solution is to aggregate PRNUs extracted from all frames, or at least all the I frames, according to Equation ( 1 ). At the same time, this approach can hardly be applied to the case of stabilized videos.…”
Section: Findings and Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a strategy that could be optimal both in presence of EIS and not is difficult to be achieved. In fact, the literature [ 21 , 31 ] shows that for non-stabilized videos, the optimal solution is to aggregate PRNUs extracted from all frames, or at least all the I frames, according to Equation ( 1 ). At the same time, this approach can hardly be applied to the case of stabilized videos.…”
Section: Findings and Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Roos and Geradts [9] investigated different factors, such as resolution, length of the video and compression, that influence camera video identification based on PRNU (photo response non-uniformity noise). To this end, Ferrara et al [10] presented a new approach for the performance evaluation of source camera attribution by using likelihood ratio methods obtained from the PRNU similarity scores. Dal Cortivo et al [11] investigated the camera model identification on video proposing a CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) based method jointly exploit audio and visual information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%