2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of single-sided natural ventilation for generic building using large-eddy simulations: Effect of guide vanes and adjacent obstacles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also emphasize that the spatiotemporal variability of the wind has important effects on thermal exposure in urban areas [48,49]. The effects on thermal exposure of the complexity of turbulence in street canyons [35,50] as well as in cross-ventilated building areas [51][52][53] have been particularly difficult to quantify in the absence of information concerning wind velocity components in street canyons. In urban canyons without trees, only the primary vortex with its leeward side near the overheated surfaces and the windward side near shaded surfaces has been modelled with any regularity, following the description that appears in [54].…”
Section: Public Placesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The results also emphasize that the spatiotemporal variability of the wind has important effects on thermal exposure in urban areas [48,49]. The effects on thermal exposure of the complexity of turbulence in street canyons [35,50] as well as in cross-ventilated building areas [51][52][53] have been particularly difficult to quantify in the absence of information concerning wind velocity components in street canyons. In urban canyons without trees, only the primary vortex with its leeward side near the overheated surfaces and the windward side near shaded surfaces has been modelled with any regularity, following the description that appears in [54].…”
Section: Public Placesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The turbulence model choice relies on the detail level required to be detected and examined, and the differences between turbulence models complexity depend on the nature of the Navier–Stokes equation (Sodja and Podgornik, 2007). Recent works on wind-driven ventilation revealed that few studies applied the LES turbulence model, focused mainly on the validation and comparison of the accuracy with RANS models and wind tunnel experiments (Arinami et al , 2019; Cheng et al , 2003; Kato et al , 1992; Tominaga et al , 2008a; van Hooff et al , 2017). Although the accuracy and the reliability of LES in predicting the airflow characteristic compared to the other turbulence models (RANS), LES still time-consuming due to the massive computational required for the simulation (Cheng et al , 2003).…”
Section: Research Methodology and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, several studies are concentrated on measuring, evaluating, and predicting this passive strategy, especially in recent years because of sustainable and energy demand goals [16,32]. Some emphasize either cross-or single-sided ventilation, investigating specific topics such as the impact of the building dimensions [33], internal divisions [34], multiple windows [35], sheltering [36,37], adjacent obstacles [38,39], wind exchangers [40], large openings [41], and a greenhouse with a wind tower [42]. Moreover, Dai et al [43] study air quality and virus propagation in interunit dispersion in multistory buildings.…”
Section: State Of the Art In Wind-driven Natural Ventilation Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%